πŸ€ NBA Model 2026-27 Β· paper trade Β· generated 2026-10-29 17:35 ET

How to read a card: the first sentence is the conclusion β€” who the model picks, what the book line says, and where they disagree. The numbers below are the inputs. Paper-trade phase: ratings run on 2025-26 priors + early-season noise. Rest/B2B shown and logged, not priced. Value flags are hypotheses, never bets. Quarter records are season history, not a prediction.
Cleveland Cavaliers @ Atlanta Hawks
Thu Oct 29 Β· 8:00 PM EDT Β· 10/29 - 8:00 PM EDT
Model says Atlanta Hawks by 1.1. The book line says Atlanta Hawks by 1.5. So the model leans Cleveland Cavaliers +1.5. Total: model 233.9, book 237.5 β€” leans under. The injury shadow disagrees β€” it leans Atlanta Hawks. Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 CLE 2-2 vs ATL 2-3 Β· Q2 CLE 2-2 vs ATL 2-2-1 Β· Q3 CLE 3-1 vs ATL 2-2-1 Β· Q4 CLE 1-2-1 vs ATL 3-1-1
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Against the spread: CLE +1.5
Total points: Under 237.5
Winner: ATL (-112) Β· 53%
⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Model says
Atlanta Hawks by 1.1 Β· win chance 53%
Model total points
233.9 (gap -3.6 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread -1.5 Β· total 237.5
moneyline -108 / -112
Model margin built from
efficiency -0.86 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
-0.4 pts vs book line
Rest days
CLE 0d rest πŸ” B2B Β· ATL 0d rest πŸ” B2B
Efficiency (net rating)
CLE +3.8 Β· ATL +2.9
last season counts for 80%
Injury report: CLE 2 players Β· ATL 2 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) +1.6 vs official +1.1 β€” CLE βˆ’0.0 (β€”) Β· ATL +0.4 (Mouhamed Gueye -0.4) Β· unknown value: Henri Veesaar, Meleek Thomas
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Atlanta Hawks +1.1 (53% to win outright). DK has Atlanta Hawks -1.5. Model-vs-line gap: -0.4 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-0.86) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS CLE; Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Cleveland Cavaliers β€” strengths & weaknesses
Cleveland Cavaliers (CLE) ranks #10 at +3.8 net β€” 118.4 offense, 114.7 defense, 100.3 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
βœ“ top-third offense (118.4 pts/100)
Atlanta Hawks β€” strengths & weaknesses
Atlanta Hawks (ATL) ranks #12 at +2.9 net β€” 116.1 offense, 113.2 defense, 102.1 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ top-third defense (113.2 allowed/100)
βœ“ plays fast (102.1 pace)
The exploitation map
Cleveland Cavaliers's elite offense runs into Atlanta Hawks's lockdown defense β€” strength on strength.
Rest gap: Cleveland Cavaliers and Atlanta Hawks on the second night of a back-to-back. The model prices rest at 0.0 β€” this is a hole in the number, not an edge.
Torque's read
Strength on strength decides this one β€” the elite-offense-vs-lockdown-defense battle is the game.
The biggest swing factor is Mouhamed Gueye (Out for Atlanta Hawks β€” Foot Fracture).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β€” the price is the game.
Rest
Cleveland Cavaliers: 0d rest (second night of a back-to-back β€” NOT priced into the model)
Atlanta Hawks: 0d rest (second night of a back-to-back β€” NOT priced into the model)
Injuries
Cleveland Cavaliers: Meleek Thomas (Day-To-Day β€” Foot (return 2026-10-29)); Jaylon Tyson (Day-To-Day β€” Neck (return 2026-10-29)).
Atlanta Hawks: Mouhamed Gueye (Out β€” Foot Fracture (return 2026-11-20)); Henri Veesaar (Out β€” Knee (return 2027-07-01)).
Line movement
Spread steady at -1.5
Model total 233.9 vs listed 237.5 (edge -3.6) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Sacramento Kings @ New Orleans Pelicans
Thu Oct 29 Β· 8:00 PM EDT Β· 10/29 - 8:00 PM EDT
Model says New Orleans Pelicans by 8.6. The book line says New Orleans Pelicans by 6.5. So the model leans New Orleans Pelicans -6.5. Total: model 232.6, book 235.5 β€” leans under. The injury shadow disagrees β€” it leans Sacramento Kings. Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 SAC 2-2 vs NO 1-3 Β· Q2 SAC 1-3 vs NO 3-1 Β· Q3 SAC 1-3 vs NO 3-1 Β· Q4 SAC 1-2-1 vs NO 0-4
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Against the spread: NO -6.5
Total points: Under 235.5
Winner: NO (-238) Β· 74%
⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Model says
New Orleans Pelicans by 8.6 Β· win chance 74%
Model total points
232.6 (gap -2.9 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread -6.5 Β· total 235.5
moneyline +195 / -238
Model margin built from
efficiency +6.64 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
+2.1 pts vs book line
Rest days
SAC 1d rest Β· NO 0d rest πŸ” B2B
Efficiency (net rating)
SAC -11.3 Β· NO -4.7
last season counts for 84%
Injury report: SAC 4 players Β· NO 2 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) +5.4 vs official +8.6 β€” SAC +4.4 (Dylan Cardwell -0.8, Maxime Raynaud -1.3, Keegan Murray -2.2) Β· NO +1.1 (Jordan Poole -0.4, Yves Missi -0.7) Β· unknown value: Ben Simmons
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes New Orleans Pelicans +8.6 (74% to win outright). DK has New Orleans Pelicans -6.5. Model-vs-line gap: +2.1 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (+6.64) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS NO; Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Sacramento Kings β€” strengths & weaknesses
Sacramento Kings (SAC) ranks #30 at -11.3 net β€” 110.7 offense, 122.0 defense, 99.4 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
βœ— bottom-third offense (110.7 pts/100)
βœ— bottom-third defense (122.0 allowed/100)
New Orleans Pelicans β€” strengths & weaknesses
New Orleans Pelicans (NO) ranks #23 at -4.7 net β€” 113.9 offense, 118.6 defense, 100.5 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
βœ“ plays fast (100.5 pace)
βœ— bottom-third defense (118.6 allowed/100)
The exploitation map
The worst faucet meets a leaky pipe: Sacramento Kings (110.7 pts/100) may not punish New Orleans Pelicans's 118.6 allowed.
Rest gap: New Orleans Pelicans on the second night of a back-to-back. The model prices rest at 0.0 β€” this is a hole in the number, not an edge.
Torque's read
The key question is whether the weak offense can punish the leaky defense β€” usually it can't, and that decides the game.
The biggest swing factor is Dylan Cardwell (Out for Sacramento Kings β€” Calf Strain).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β€” the price is the game.
Rest
Sacramento Kings: 1d rest
New Orleans Pelicans: 0d rest (second night of a back-to-back β€” NOT priced into the model)
Injuries
Sacramento Kings: Dylan Cardwell (Out β€” Calf Strain (return 2026-11-06)); Maxime Raynaud (Out β€” Knee Dislocated (return 2026-11-10)); Keegan Murray (Out β€” Ankle (return 2026-11-06)); Ben Simmons (Out β€” Achilles Surgery (return 2027-10-01)).
New Orleans Pelicans: Jordan Poole (Day-To-Day β€” Ankle (return 2026-10-29)); Yves Missi (Out β€” Knee Bruise (return 2026-11-02)).
Line movement
Spread -5.5 β†’ -6.5
Model total 232.6 vs listed 235.5 (edge -2.9) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Memphis Grizzlies @ Portland Trail Blazers
Thu Oct 29 Β· 10:00 PM EDT Β· 10/29 - 10:00 PM EDT
Model says Portland Trail Blazers by 7.4. The book line says Portland Trail Blazers by 7.5. So the model leans Memphis Grizzlies +7.5. Total: model 232.2, book 232.5 β€” leans under. The injury shadow disagrees β€” it leans Portland Trail Blazers. Locks at 9:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 MEM 1-3 vs POR 1-2 Β· Q2 MEM 3-1 vs POR 3-0 Β· Q3 MEM 2-2 vs POR 3-0 Β· Q4 MEM 3-1 vs POR 1-1-1
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Against the spread: MEM +7.5
Total points: Under 232.5
Winner: POR (-290) Β· 71%
⏳ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Model says
Portland Trail Blazers by 7.4 Β· win chance 71%
Model total points
232.2 (gap -0.3 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread -7.5 Β· total 232.5
moneyline +235 / -290
Model margin built from
efficiency +5.39 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
-0.1 pts vs book line
Rest days
MEM 2d rest Β· POR 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating)
MEM -3.4 Β· POR +2.0
last season counts for 88%
Injury report: MEM 0 players Β· POR 3 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) +8.1 vs official +7.4 β€” MEM βˆ’0.0 (β€”) Β· POR +0.7 (Robert Williams III 0.4, Chris Youngblood -0.3, Shaedon Sharpe -0.9)
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Portland Trail Blazers +7.4 (71% to win outright). DK has Portland Trail Blazers -7.5. Model-vs-line gap: -0.1 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (+5.39) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS MEM; Locks at 9:30 PM ET.
Memphis Grizzlies β€” strengths & weaknesses
Memphis Grizzlies (MEM) ranks #21 at -3.4 net β€” 113.6 offense, 117.0 defense, 101.0 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
βœ“ plays fast (101.0 pace)
βœ— bottom-third offense (113.6 pts/100)
βœ— bottom-third defense (117.0 allowed/100)
Portland Trail Blazers β€” strengths & weaknesses
Portland Trail Blazers (POR) ranks #14 at +2.0 net β€” 116.1 offense, 114.2 defense, 100.5 pace. 3 games played; priors carry 88% of the blend.
No clear strengths or weaknesses by the tercile test β€” a league-average profile.
The exploitation map
No clear cross-matchups by the tercile test β€” neither team's calling card lines up against the other's soft spot.
Torque's read
No single matchup dominates β€” this one is won in the margins.
The biggest swing factor is Chris Youngblood (Out for Portland Trail Blazers β€” Ankle Soreness).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β€” the price is the game.
Rest
Memphis Grizzlies: 2d rest
Portland Trail Blazers: 1d rest
Injuries
Portland Trail Blazers: Robert Williams III (Day-To-Day β€” Knee (return 2026-10-29)); Chris Youngblood (Out β€” Ankle Soreness (return 2026-10-29)); Shaedon Sharpe (Out β€” Knee Surgery (return 2027-03-02)).
Line movement
Spread steady at -7.5
Model total 232.2 vs listed 232.5 (edge -0.3) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Charlotte Hornets @ Washington Wizards
Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:00 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 7:00 PM EDT
Model says Charlotte Hornets by 10.2. The book line says Charlotte Hornets by 1.5. So the model leans Charlotte Hornets -1.5. Total: model 229.1, book 222.5 β€” leans over. Paper trade only β€” a test flag, not a bet.
Quarter records so far: Q1 CHA 2-2-1 vs WSH 4-1 Β· Q2 CHA 4-1 vs WSH 2-3 Β· Q3 CHA 2-3 vs WSH 3-2 Β· Q4 CHA 1-4 vs WSH 2-3
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 6:30 PM ET
Against the spread: CHA -1.5
Total points: Over 222.5
Winner: CHA (-115) Β· 77%
⏳ Locks at 6:30 PM ET
Model says
Charlotte Hornets by 10.2 Β· win chance 77%
Model total points
229.1 (gap +6.6 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread 1.5 Β· total 222.5
moneyline -115 / -105
Model margin built from
efficiency -12.17 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
-8.7 pts vs book line
Rest days
CHA 1d rest Β· WSH 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating)
CHA +2.5 Β· WSH -9.8
last season counts for 80%
Injury report: CHA 4 players Β· WSH 4 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) -6.1 vs official -10.2 β€” CHA βˆ’1.8 (Kon Knueppel 1.8, Coby White -0.7, Grant Williams 0.7) Β· WSH +2.2 (Tre Johnson -0.6, Justin Champagnie -0.2, Jamir Watkins -1.4) Β· unknown value: Kylan Boswell
πŸ“ PAPER TRADE flag: the model leans Charlotte Hornets by 8.7 pts vs the book line (5+ point bar). A test flag only β€” not a bet, not an edge.
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Washington Wizards -10.2 (23% to win outright). DK has Charlotte Hornets -1.5. Model-vs-line gap: -8.7 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-12.17) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS CHA; Locks at 6:30 PM ET.
Charlotte Hornets β€” strengths & weaknesses
Charlotte Hornets (CHA) ranks #13 at +2.5 net β€” 116.4 offense, 113.9 defense, 96.8 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
No clear strengths or weaknesses by the tercile test β€” a league-average profile.
Washington Wizards β€” strengths & weaknesses
Washington Wizards (WSH) ranks #28 at -9.8 net β€” 111.5 offense, 121.3 defense, 101.1 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ plays fast (101.1 pace)
βœ— bottom-third offense (111.5 pts/100)
βœ— bottom-third defense (121.3 allowed/100)
The exploitation map
Pace clash: Washington Wizards wants it fast (101.1) while Charlotte Hornets slows it down (96.8).
Torque's read
This one is won or lost in the pace battle β€” whoever imposes their tempo has the edge.
The biggest swing factor is Kon Knueppel (Out for Charlotte Hornets β€” Hamstring).
Verdict: the 8.7pt disagreement on Charlotte Hornets is the one to watch as the forward test β€” hypothesis only, never a bet.
Rest
Charlotte Hornets: 1d rest
Washington Wizards: 1d rest
Injuries
Charlotte Hornets: Kon Knueppel (Out β€” Hamstring (return 2026-11-02)); Coby White (Out β€” Calf Strain (return 2026-11-02)); Grant Williams (Out β€” Hamstring (return 2026-11-02)); Kylan Boswell (Out β€” Knee Surgery (return 2026-11-02)).
Washington Wizards: Tre Johnson (Day-To-Day β€” Achilles Soreness (return 2026-10-30)); Justin Champagnie (Out β€” Foot Not Specified (return 2027-02-25)); Tristan Vukcevic (Out β€” Hip Pinched Nerve (return 2026-11-02)); Jamir Watkins (Out β€” Knee Surgery (return 2027-04-02)).
Line movement
Spread steady at +1.5
Model total 229.1 vs listed 222.5 (edge +6.6) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Chicago Bulls @ Boston Celtics
Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:30 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 7:30 PM EDT
Model says Boston Celtics by 17.1. The book line says Boston Celtics by 15.5. So the model leans Boston Celtics -15.5. Total: model 230.2, book 231.5 β€” leans under. Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 CHI 0-5 vs BOS 2-2 Β· Q2 CHI 3-1-1 vs BOS 2-0-2 Β· Q3 CHI 0-4-1 vs BOS 3-1 Β· Q4 CHI 2-3 vs BOS 1-3
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Against the spread: BOS -15.5
Total points: Under 231.5
Winner: BOS (-850) Β· 90%
⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Model says
Boston Celtics by 17.1 Β· win chance 90%
Model total points
230.2 (gap -1.3 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread -15.5 Β· total 231.5
moneyline +575 / -850
Model margin built from
efficiency +15.08 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
+1.6 pts vs book line
Rest days
CHI 1d rest Β· BOS 2d rest
Efficiency (net rating)
CHI -7.1 Β· BOS +8.1
last season counts for 84%
Injury report: CHI 4 players Β· BOS 1 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) +16.6 vs official +17.1 β€” CHI +1.5 (Patrick Williams -1.9, Nic Claxton 0.5) Β· BOS +1.0 (Devin Carter -1.0) Β· unknown value: Tobe Awaka
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Boston Celtics +17.1 (90% to win outright). DK has Boston Celtics -15.5. Model-vs-line gap: +1.6 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (+15.08) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS BOS; Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Chicago Bulls β€” strengths & weaknesses
Chicago Bulls (CHI) ranks #25 at -7.1 net β€” 111.7 offense, 118.8 defense, 103.4 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ plays fast (103.4 pace)
βœ— bottom-third offense (111.7 pts/100)
βœ— bottom-third defense (118.8 allowed/100)
Boston Celtics β€” strengths & weaknesses
Boston Celtics (BOS) ranks #2 at +8.1 net β€” 120.3 offense, 112.3 defense, 95.5 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
βœ“ top-third offense (120.3 pts/100)
βœ“ top-third defense (112.3 allowed/100)
The exploitation map
Boston Celtics's top-third offense (120.3 pts/100) against Chicago Bulls's bottom-third defense (118.8 allowed) is the most direct exploitation on the board.
Pace clash: Chicago Bulls wants it fast (103.4) while Boston Celtics slows it down (95.5).
Torque's read
The game is decided where the best offense meets the worst defense β€” that's the matchup that matters most.
The biggest swing factor is Patrick Williams (Out for Chicago Bulls β€” Groin Soreness).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β€” the price is the game.
Rest
Chicago Bulls: 1d rest
Boston Celtics: 2d rest
Injuries
Chicago Bulls: Patrick Williams (Out β€” Groin Soreness (return 2026-10-30)); Jalen Smith (Day-To-Day β€” Finger (return 2026-10-30)); Tobe Awaka (Day-To-Day β€” Ankle (return 2026-10-30)); Nic Claxton (Out β€” Hamstring (return 2026-11-04)).
Boston Celtics: Devin Carter (Out β€” Illness (return 2026-11-08)).
Line movement
Spread -11.5 β†’ -15.5
Model total 230.2 vs listed 231.5 (edge -1.3) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Detroit Pistons @ Brooklyn Nets
Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:30 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 7:30 PM EDT
Model says Detroit Pistons by 15.7. The book line says Detroit Pistons by 7.5. So the model leans Detroit Pistons -7.5. Total: model 223.1, book 221.5 β€” leans over. Paper trade only β€” a test flag, not a bet.
Quarter records so far: Q1 DET 3-2 vs BKN 2-2 Β· Q2 DET 0-4-1 vs BKN 0-3-1 Β· Q3 DET 3-2 vs BKN 1-3 Β· Q4 DET 4-1 vs BKN 2-2
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Against the spread: DET -7.5
Total points: Over 221.5
Winner: DET (-258) Β· 88%
⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Model says
Detroit Pistons by 15.7 Β· win chance 88%
Model total points
223.1 (gap +1.6 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread 7.5 Β· total 221.5
moneyline -258 / +210
Model margin built from
efficiency -17.71 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
-8.2 pts vs book line
Rest days
DET 1d rest Β· BKN 2d rest
Efficiency (net rating)
DET +7.9 Β· BKN -10.1
last season counts for 84%
Injury report: DET 2 players Β· BKN 2 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) -12.5 vs official -15.7 β€” DET βˆ’3.2 (Isaiah Joe 0.3, Jalen Duren 2.9) Β· BKN βˆ’0.0 (β€”) Β· unknown value: Egor Demin, Tyler Bilodeau
πŸ“ PAPER TRADE flag: the model leans Detroit Pistons by 8.2 pts vs the book line (5+ point bar). A test flag only β€” not a bet, not an edge.
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Brooklyn Nets -15.7 (12% to win outright). DK has Detroit Pistons -7.5. Model-vs-line gap: -8.2 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-17.71) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS DET; Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Detroit Pistons β€” strengths & weaknesses
Detroit Pistons (DET) ranks #4 at +7.9 net β€” 116.9 offense, 109.0 defense, 98.9 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ top-third offense (116.9 pts/100)
βœ“ top-third defense (109.0 allowed/100)
Brooklyn Nets β€” strengths & weaknesses
Brooklyn Nets (BKN) ranks #29 at -10.1 net β€” 108.7 offense, 118.9 defense, 97.9 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
βœ— bottom-third offense (108.7 pts/100)
βœ— bottom-third defense (118.9 allowed/100)
The exploitation map
Detroit Pistons's top-third offense (116.9 pts/100) against Brooklyn Nets's bottom-third defense (118.9 allowed) is the most direct exploitation on the board.
Torque's read
The game is decided where the best offense meets the worst defense β€” that's the matchup that matters most.
The biggest swing factor is Jalen Duren (Out for Detroit Pistons β€” Hamstring Strain).
Verdict: the 8.2pt disagreement on Detroit Pistons is the one to watch as the forward test β€” hypothesis only, never a bet.
Rest
Detroit Pistons: 1d rest
Brooklyn Nets: 2d rest
Injuries
Detroit Pistons: Isaiah Joe (Day-To-Day β€” Hip Bruise (return 2026-10-30)); Jalen Duren (Out β€” Hamstring Strain (return 2026-11-09)).
Brooklyn Nets: Egor Demin (Out β€” Leg Bruise (return 2026-11-07)); Tyler Bilodeau (Out β€” Shoulder Sprain (return 2026-11-01)).
Line movement
Spread steady at +7.5
Model total 223.1 vs listed 221.5 (edge +1.6) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
New York Knicks @ Philadelphia 76ers
Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:30 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 7:30 PM EDT
Model says New York Knicks by 2.6. The book line says Philadelphia 76ers by 1.5. So the model leans New York Knicks +1.5. Total: model 225.9, book 228.5 β€” leans under. Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 NY 4-1 vs PHI 1-3-1 Β· Q2 NY 2-3 vs PHI 1-3-1 Β· Q3 NY 1-2-2 vs PHI 4-1 Β· Q4 NY 3-2 vs PHI 3-2
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Against the spread: NY +1.5
Total points: Under 228.5
Winner: NY (-110) Β· 58%
⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Model says
New York Knicks by 2.6 Β· win chance 58%
Model total points
225.9 (gap -2.6 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread -1.5 Β· total 228.5
moneyline -110 / -110
Model margin built from
efficiency -4.60 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
-4.1 pts vs book line
Rest days
NY 1d rest Β· PHI 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating)
NY +5.2 Β· PHI +0.6
last season counts for 80%
Injury report: NY 1 players Β· PHI 4 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) -1.9 vs official -2.6 β€” NY +0.4 (Jose Alvarado -0.4) Β· PHI +1.1 (Jabari Walker -0.2, Dominick Barlow -0.6, Ariel Hukporti -0.4) Β· unknown value: Tacko Fall
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Philadelphia 76ers -2.6 (42% to win outright). DK has Philadelphia 76ers -1.5. Model-vs-line gap: -4.1 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-4.60) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS NY; Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
New York Knicks β€” strengths & weaknesses
New York Knicks (NY) ranks #6 at +5.2 net β€” 117.9 offense, 112.7 defense, 97.4 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ top-third offense (117.9 pts/100)
βœ“ top-third defense (112.7 allowed/100)
Philadelphia 76ers β€” strengths & weaknesses
Philadelphia 76ers (PHI) ranks #16 at +0.6 net β€” 113.7 offense, 113.1 defense, 100.3 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ top-third defense (113.1 allowed/100)
The exploitation map
New York Knicks's elite offense runs into Philadelphia 76ers's lockdown defense β€” strength on strength.
Torque's read
Strength on strength decides this one β€” the elite-offense-vs-lockdown-defense battle is the game.
The biggest swing factor is Jose Alvarado (Out for New York Knicks β€” Ankle Sprain).
Verdict: a mild lean at best β€” under the 5pt bar, not a play.
Rest
New York Knicks: 1d rest
Philadelphia 76ers: 1d rest
Injuries
New York Knicks: Jose Alvarado (Out β€” Ankle Sprain (return 2026-10-30)).
Philadelphia 76ers: Jabari Walker (Day-To-Day β€” Knee Soreness (return 2026-10-30)); Tacko Fall (Out β€” Quadriceps Strain (return 2026-11-04)); Dominick Barlow (Out β€” Back Fracture (return 2026-11-04)); Ariel Hukporti (Out β€” Achilles Surgery (return 2027-10-01)).
Line movement
Spread steady at -1.5
Model total 225.9 vs listed 228.5 (edge -2.6) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Orlando Magic @ Toronto Raptors
Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:30 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 7:30 PM EDT
Model says Toronto Raptors by 8.2. The book line says Toronto Raptors by 5.5. So the model leans Toronto Raptors -5.5. Total: model 226.7, book 224.5 β€” leans over. The injury shadow disagrees β€” it leans Orlando Magic. Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 ORL 1-3 vs TOR 3-1 Β· Q2 ORL 1-3 vs TOR 3-1 Β· Q3 ORL 1-2-1 vs TOR 2-2 Β· Q4 ORL 2-2 vs TOR 4-0
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Against the spread: TOR -5.5
Total points: Over 224.5
Winner: TOR (-192) Β· 73%
⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Model says
Toronto Raptors by 8.2 Β· win chance 73%
Model total points
226.7 (gap +2.2 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread -5.5 Β· total 224.5
moneyline +160 / -192
Model margin built from
efficiency +6.17 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
+2.7 pts vs book line
Rest days
ORL 1d rest Β· TOR 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating)
ORL -1.4 Β· TOR +4.7
last season counts for 84%
Injury report: ORL 5 players Β· TOR 2 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) +4.5 vs official +8.2 β€” ORL βˆ’1.7 (Jonathan Isaac -0.3, Jalen Suggs 1.4, Paolo Banchero 1.0, Noah Penda -0.4) Β· TOR βˆ’5.3 (Kawhi Leonard 5.3) Β· unknown value: Izaiyah Nelson, Nate Bittle
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Toronto Raptors +8.2 (73% to win outright). DK has Toronto Raptors -5.5. Model-vs-line gap: +2.7 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (+6.17) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS TOR; Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Orlando Magic β€” strengths & weaknesses
Orlando Magic (ORL) ranks #20 at -1.4 net β€” 113.1 offense, 114.5 defense, 100.5 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
βœ— bottom-third offense (113.1 pts/100)
Toronto Raptors β€” strengths & weaknesses
Toronto Raptors (TOR) ranks #8 at +4.7 net β€” 115.4 offense, 110.6 defense, 99.4 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
βœ“ top-third defense (110.6 allowed/100)
The exploitation map
No clear cross-matchups by the tercile test β€” neither team's calling card lines up against the other's soft spot.
Torque's read
No single matchup dominates β€” this one is won in the margins.
The biggest swing factor is Jonathan Isaac (Out for Orlando Magic β€” Knee Not Specified).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β€” the price is the game.
Rest
Orlando Magic: 1d rest
Toronto Raptors: 1d rest
Injuries
Orlando Magic: Jonathan Isaac (Out β€” Knee Not Specified (return 2026-11-10)); Jalen Suggs (Out β€” Knee (return 2026-11-10)); Paolo Banchero (Out β€” Ankle Sprain (return 2026-11-22)); Noah Penda (Out β€” Hamstring Strain (return 2026-11-18)).
Toronto Raptors: Kawhi Leonard (Out β€” Knee Inflammation (return 2026-11-23)); Nate Bittle (Out β€” Foot Fracture (return 2026-11-02)).
Line movement
Spread -3.5 β†’ -5.5
Model total 226.7 vs listed 224.5 (edge +2.2) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Indiana Pacers @ Miami Heat
Fri Oct 30 Β· 8:00 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 8:00 PM EDT
Model says Miami Heat by 8.7. The book line says Miami Heat by 5.5. So the model leans Miami Heat -5.5. Total: model 234.8, book 239.5 β€” leans under. Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 IND 1-3-1 vs MIA 2-2-1 Β· Q2 IND 2-3 vs MIA 2-3 Β· Q3 IND 4-1 vs MIA 1-4 Β· Q4 IND 3-2 vs MIA 2-2-1
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Against the spread: MIA -5.5
Total points: Under 239.5
Winner: MIA (-205) Β· 74%
⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Model says
Miami Heat by 8.7 Β· win chance 74%
Model total points
234.8 (gap -4.7 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread -5.5 Β· total 239.5
moneyline +170 / -205
Model margin built from
efficiency +6.70 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
+3.2 pts vs book line
Rest days
IND 1d rest Β· MIA 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating)
IND -6.3 Β· MIA +0.3
last season counts for 80%
Injury report: IND 7 players Β· MIA 1 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) +6.0 vs official +8.7 β€” IND +2.7 (Andrew Nembhard -0.1, Aaron Nesmith -0.5, Ivica Zubac -0.2, T.J. McConnell 0.9, Ben Sheppard -1.3, Johnny Furphy -1.4) Β· MIA βˆ’0.0 (β€”) Β· unknown value: Tyrese Haliburton
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Miami Heat +8.7 (74% to win outright). DK has Miami Heat -5.5. Model-vs-line gap: +3.2 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (+6.70) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS MIA; Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Indiana Pacers β€” strengths & weaknesses
Indiana Pacers (IND) ranks #24 at -6.3 net β€” 111.2 offense, 117.5 defense, 101.3 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ plays fast (101.3 pace)
βœ— bottom-third offense (111.2 pts/100)
βœ— bottom-third defense (117.5 allowed/100)
Miami Heat β€” strengths & weaknesses
Miami Heat (MIA) ranks #17 at +0.3 net β€” 115.1 offense, 114.8 defense, 103.5 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ plays fast (103.5 pace)
The exploitation map
No clear cross-matchups by the tercile test β€” neither team's calling card lines up against the other's soft spot.
Torque's read
No single matchup dominates β€” this one is won in the margins.
The biggest swing factor is Ivica Zubac (Out for Indiana Pacers β€” Ankle Sprain).
Verdict: a mild lean at best β€” under the 5pt bar, not a play.
Rest
Indiana Pacers: 1d rest
Miami Heat: 1d rest
Injuries
Indiana Pacers: Andrew Nembhard (Day-To-Day β€” Neck Soreness (return 2026-10-30)); Aaron Nesmith (Day-To-Day β€” Hamstring (return 2026-10-30)); Ivica Zubac (Out β€” Ankle Sprain (return 2026-11-01)); T.J. McConnell (Out β€” Hamstring Strain (return 2026-11-02)).
Miami Heat: Simone Fontecchio (Day-To-Day β€” Illness (return 2026-10-30)).
Line movement
Spread +3.5 β†’ -5.5
Model total 234.8 vs listed 239.5 (edge -4.7) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Houston Rockets @ Dallas Mavericks
Fri Oct 30 Β· 8:00 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 8:00 PM EDT
Model says Houston Rockets by 8.9. The book line says Houston Rockets by 5.5. So the model leans Houston Rockets -5.5. Total: model 227.6, book 227.5 β€” leans over. Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 HOU 4-1 vs DAL 2-3 Β· Q2 HOU 3-1-1 vs DAL 3-2 Β· Q3 HOU 3-1-1 vs DAL 3-2 Β· Q4 HOU 2-2-1 vs DAL 3-2
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Against the spread: HOU -5.5
Total points: Over 227.5
Winner: HOU (-192) Β· 75%
⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Model says
Houston Rockets by 8.9 Β· win chance 75%
Model total points
227.6 (gap +0.1 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread 5.5 Β· total 227.5
moneyline -192 / +160
Model margin built from
efficiency -10.90 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
-3.4 pts vs book line
Rest days
HOU 1d rest Β· DAL 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating)
HOU +7.2 Β· DAL -3.8
last season counts for 80%
Injury report: HOU 4 players Β· DAL 5 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) -10.1 vs official -8.9 β€” HOU +0.1 (Reed Sheppard 1.5, Marcus Smart -1.3, Steven Adams -0.2) Β· DAL βˆ’1.1 (Santi Aldama 1.0, Dereck Lively II 0.2) Β· unknown value: Alperen Sengun, Sergio de Larrea, Tarik Biberovic
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Dallas Mavericks -8.9 (25% to win outright). DK has Houston Rockets -5.5. Model-vs-line gap: -3.4 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-10.90) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS HOU; Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Houston Rockets β€” strengths & weaknesses
Houston Rockets (HOU) ranks #5 at +7.2 net β€” 119.6 offense, 112.4 defense, 96.8 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ top-third offense (119.6 pts/100)
βœ“ top-third defense (112.4 allowed/100)
Dallas Mavericks β€” strengths & weaknesses
Dallas Mavericks (DAL) ranks #22 at -3.8 net β€” 111.7 offense, 115.5 defense, 101.4 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ plays fast (101.4 pace)
βœ— bottom-third offense (111.7 pts/100)
The exploitation map
Pace clash: Dallas Mavericks wants it fast (101.4) while Houston Rockets slows it down (96.8).
Torque's read
This one is won or lost in the pace battle β€” whoever imposes their tempo has the edge.
The biggest swing factor is Reed Sheppard (Out for Houston Rockets β€” Back).
Verdict: a mild lean at best β€” under the 5pt bar, not a play.
Rest
Houston Rockets: 1d rest
Dallas Mavericks: 1d rest
Injuries
Houston Rockets: Reed Sheppard (Out β€” Back (return 2026-10-31)); Marcus Smart (Out β€” Forearm Strain (return 2026-10-30)); Alperen Sengun (Day-To-Day β€” Back Soreness (return 2026-10-30)); Steven Adams (Out β€” Calf Strain (return 2026-11-02)).
Dallas Mavericks: Sergio de Larrea (Day-To-Day β€” Knee Strain (return 2026-10-30)); Naji Marshall (Day-To-Day β€” Illness (return 2026-10-30)); Tarik Biberovic (Out β€” Heel Inflammation (return 2026-10-30)); Santi Aldama (Out β€” Knee Surgery (return 2026-10-30)).
Line movement
Spread -4.5 β†’ +5.5
Model total 227.6 vs listed 227.5 (edge +0.1) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Los Angeles Clippers @ Minnesota Timberwolves
Fri Oct 30 Β· 8:00 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 8:00 PM EDT
Model says Minnesota Timberwolves by 6.2. The book line says Minnesota Timberwolves by 7.5. So the model leans Los Angeles Clippers +7.5. Total: model 226.8, book 221.5 β€” leans over. Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 LAC 2-2 vs MIN 4-1 Β· Q2 LAC 1-3 vs MIN 3-2 Β· Q3 LAC 1-3 vs MIN 4-1 Β· Q4 LAC 3-1 vs MIN 2-2-1
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Against the spread: LAC +7.5
Total points: Over 221.5
Winner: MIN (-245) Β· 68%
⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Model says
Minnesota Timberwolves by 6.2 Β· win chance 68%
Model total points
226.8 (gap +5.3 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread -7.5 Β· total 221.5
moneyline +200 / -245
Model margin built from
efficiency +4.25 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
-1.2 pts vs book line
Rest days
LAC 1d rest Β· MIN 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating)
LAC +0.8 Β· MIN +5.1
last season counts for 80%
Injury report: LAC 0 players Β· MIN 2 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) +2.5 vs official +6.2 β€” LAC βˆ’0.0 (β€”) Β· MIN βˆ’3.8 (Anthony Edwards 3.3, Donte DiVincenzo 0.5)
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Minnesota Timberwolves +6.2 (68% to win outright). DK has Minnesota Timberwolves -7.5. Model-vs-line gap: -1.2 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (+4.25) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS LAC; Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Los Angeles Clippers β€” strengths & weaknesses
Los Angeles Clippers (LAC) ranks #15 at +0.8 net β€” 115.5 offense, 114.7 defense, 97.1 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
No clear strengths or weaknesses by the tercile test β€” a league-average profile.
Minnesota Timberwolves β€” strengths & weaknesses
Minnesota Timberwolves (MIN) ranks #7 at +5.1 net β€” 116.5 offense, 111.5 defense, 100.8 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ top-third offense (116.5 pts/100)
βœ“ top-third defense (111.5 allowed/100)
βœ“ plays fast (100.8 pace)
The exploitation map
Pace clash: Minnesota Timberwolves wants it fast (100.8) while Los Angeles Clippers slows it down (97.1).
Torque's read
This one is won or lost in the pace battle β€” whoever imposes their tempo has the edge.
The biggest swing factor is Anthony Edwards (Out for Minnesota Timberwolves β€” Knee Surgery).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β€” the price is the game.
Rest
Los Angeles Clippers: 1d rest
Minnesota Timberwolves: 1d rest
Injuries
Minnesota Timberwolves: Anthony Edwards (Out β€” Knee Surgery (return 2026-12-21)); Donte DiVincenzo (Out β€” Achilles Surgery (return 2027-04-02)).
Line movement
Spread -9.5 β†’ -7.5
Model total 226.8 vs listed 221.5 (edge +5.3) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Los Angeles Lakers @ Golden State Warriors
Fri Oct 30 Β· 10:00 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 10:00 PM EDT
Model says Los Angeles Lakers by 2.1. The book line says Los Angeles Lakers by 1.5. So the model leans Los Angeles Lakers -1.5. Total: model 230.5, book 234.5 β€” leans under. Locks at 9:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 LAL 3-2 vs GS 3-2 Β· Q2 LAL 4-1 vs GS 2-3 Β· Q3 LAL 3-1-1 vs GS 2-3 Β· Q4 LAL 1-4 vs GS 3-2
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Against the spread: LAL -1.5
Total points: Under 234.5
Winner: LAL (-125) Β· 56%
⏳ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Model says
Los Angeles Lakers by 2.1 Β· win chance 56%
Model total points
230.5 (gap -4.0 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread 1.5 Β· total 234.5
moneyline -125 / +105
Model margin built from
efficiency -4.15 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
-0.7 pts vs book line
Rest days
LAL 1d rest Β· GS 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating)
LAL +3.4 Β· GS -0.8
last season counts for 80%
Injury report: LAL 4 players Β· GS 4 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) -6.3 vs official -2.1 β€” LAL +0.8 (Ziaire Williams -0.2, Adou Thiero -0.6) Β· GS βˆ’3.5 (Jimmy Butler III 3.6) Β· unknown value: Cameron Carr, Kristaps Porzingis, Luka Doncic
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Golden State Warriors -2.1 (44% to win outright). DK has Los Angeles Lakers -1.5. Model-vs-line gap: -0.7 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-4.15) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS LAL; Locks at 9:30 PM ET.
Los Angeles Lakers β€” strengths & weaknesses
Los Angeles Lakers (LAL) ranks #11 at +3.4 net β€” 119.2 offense, 115.9 defense, 98.6 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
βœ“ top-third offense (119.2 pts/100)
Golden State Warriors β€” strengths & weaknesses
Golden State Warriors (GS) ranks #19 at -0.8 net β€” 115.5 offense, 116.4 defense, 98.8 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
No clear strengths or weaknesses by the tercile test β€” a league-average profile.
The exploitation map
No clear cross-matchups by the tercile test β€” neither team's calling card lines up against the other's soft spot.
Torque's read
No single matchup dominates β€” this one is won in the margins.
The biggest swing factor is Cameron Carr (Out for Los Angeles Lakers β€” Oblique Strain).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β€” the price is the game.
Rest
Los Angeles Lakers: 1d rest
Golden State Warriors: 1d rest
Injuries
Los Angeles Lakers: Ziaire Williams (Day-To-Day β€” Foot (return 2026-10-30)); Luka Doncic (Day-To-Day β€” Back (return 2026-10-30)); Cameron Carr (Out β€” Oblique Strain (return 2026-10-30)); Adou Thiero (Out β€” Knee Inflammation (return 2026-10-30)).
Golden State Warriors: Gui Santos (Day-To-Day β€” Knee Tendinitis (return 2026-10-30)); Kristaps Porzingis (Out β€” Illness (return 2026-12-01)); Moses Moody (Out β€” Knee Surgery (return 2026-12-01)); Jimmy Butler III (Out β€” Knee Surgery (return 2027-01-02)).
Line movement
Spread steady at +1.5
Model total 230.5 vs listed 234.5 (edge -4.0) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Denver Nuggets @ Phoenix Suns
Fri Oct 30 Β· 10:00 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 10:00 PM EDT
Model says Denver Nuggets by 2.2. The book line says Denver Nuggets by 4.5. So the model leans Phoenix Suns +4.5. Total: model 228.3, book 229.5 β€” leans under. The injury shadow disagrees β€” it leans Denver Nuggets. Locks at 9:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 DEN 3-1 vs PHX 0-3 Β· Q2 DEN 1-3 vs PHX 1-2 Β· Q3 DEN 0-4 vs PHX 1-1-1 Β· Q4 DEN 2-2 vs PHX 1-1-1
🎯 Model pick · ⏳ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Against the spread: PHX +4.5
Total points: Under 229.5
Winner: DEN (-170) Β· 56%
⏳ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Model says
Denver Nuggets by 2.2 Β· win chance 56%
Model total points
228.3 (gap -1.2 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings)
spread 4.5 Β· total 229.5
moneyline -170 / +142
Model margin built from
efficiency -4.18 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced)
+2.3 pts vs book line
Rest days
DEN 1d rest Β· PHX 3d rest
Efficiency (net rating)
DEN +3.9 Β· PHX -0.4
last season counts for 88%
Injury report: DEN 4 players Β· PHX 2 players
🩹 Injury shadow (NOT wired β€” forward test): margin (home) -5.4 vs official -2.2 β€” DEN +2.2 (Cameron Johnson -0.4, Spencer Jones -1.1, Julian Strawther -0.7) Β· PHX βˆ’1.0 (Mark Williams 1.0) Β· unknown value: Alpha Diallo
πŸ“– Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Phoenix Suns -2.2 (44% to win outright). DK has Denver Nuggets -4.5. Model-vs-line gap: +2.3 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-4.18) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22–2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
⏳ Live model pick: ATS PHX; Locks at 9:30 PM ET.
Denver Nuggets β€” strengths & weaknesses
Denver Nuggets (DEN) ranks #9 at +3.9 net β€” 120.7 offense, 116.8 defense, 98.3 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
βœ“ top-third offense (120.7 pts/100)
βœ— bottom-third defense (116.8 allowed/100)
Phoenix Suns β€” strengths & weaknesses
Phoenix Suns (PHX) ranks #18 at -0.4 net β€” 114.8 offense, 115.2 defense, 97.0 pace. 3 games played; priors carry 88% of the blend.
No clear strengths or weaknesses by the tercile test β€” a league-average profile.
The exploitation map
No clear cross-matchups by the tercile test β€” neither team's calling card lines up against the other's soft spot.
Torque's read
No single matchup dominates β€” this one is won in the margins.
The biggest swing factor is Cameron Johnson (Out for Denver Nuggets β€” Ankle Sprain).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β€” the price is the game.
Rest
Denver Nuggets: 1d rest
Phoenix Suns: 3d rest
Injuries
Denver Nuggets: Cameron Johnson (Out β€” Ankle Sprain (return 2026-10-30)); Spencer Jones (Out β€” Hamstring Not Specified (return 2026-11-02)); Alpha Diallo (Out β€” Personal (return 2026-10-30)); Julian Strawther (Out β€” Knee Sprain (return 2026-11-29)).
Phoenix Suns: Oso Ighodaro (Day-To-Day β€” Oblique Strain (return 2026-10-30)); Mark Williams (Out β€” Shoulder Surgery (return 2027-02-03)).
Line movement
Spread +2.5 β†’ +4.5
Model total 228.3 vs listed 229.5 (edge -1.2) β€” the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Forward-test hypothesis only. These are the model's strongest reads for this slate β€” not bets, not edges. Locked picks are the official basis; pre-lock rows are early looks β€” not official. Every locked pick is graded from game one (Record tab); the board is judged as a forward test after ~100 graded plays with CLV tracked.

Top spread reads ranked by gap vs book line

#GameModel sideModel marginGap vs bookBook spreadBasis
#1Charlotte Hornets @ Washington Wizards
Fri Oct 30 · 7:00 PM EDT		Charlotte Hornets-10.2-8.71.5⏳ Locks at 6:30 PM ET
#2Detroit Pistons @ Brooklyn Nets
Fri Oct 30 · 7:30 PM EDT		Detroit Pistons-15.7-8.27.5⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
#3New York Knicks @ Philadelphia 76ers
Fri Oct 30 · 7:30 PM EDT		New York Knicks-2.6-4.1-1.5⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
#4Houston Rockets @ Dallas Mavericks
Fri Oct 30 · 8:00 PM EDT		Houston Rockets-8.9-3.45.5⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
#5Indiana Pacers @ Miami Heat
Fri Oct 30 · 8:00 PM EDT		Miami Heat+8.7+3.2-5.5⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET

Top moneyline reads ranked by model win chance

#GameModel sideWin chanceBook MLBasis
#1Chicago Bulls @ Boston Celtics
Fri Oct 30 · 7:30 PM EDT		Boston Celtics90%-850⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
#2Detroit Pistons @ Brooklyn Nets
Fri Oct 30 · 7:30 PM EDT		Detroit Pistons88%-258⏳ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
#3Charlotte Hornets @ Washington Wizards
Fri Oct 30 · 7:00 PM EDT		Charlotte Hornets77%-115⏳ Locks at 6:30 PM ET
#4Houston Rockets @ Dallas Mavericks
Fri Oct 30 · 8:00 PM EDT		Houston Rockets75%-192⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
#5Indiana Pacers @ Miami Heat
Fri Oct 30 · 8:00 PM EDT		Miami Heat74%-205⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET

Top totals reads ranked by gap vs book total

#GameModel sideModel totalGap vs bookBook totalBasis
#1Charlotte Hornets @ Washington Wizards
Fri Oct 30 · 7:00 PM EDT		over229.1+6.6222.5⏳ Locks at 6:30 PM ET
#2Los Angeles Clippers @ Minnesota Timberwolves
Fri Oct 30 · 8:00 PM EDT		over226.8+5.3221.5⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
#3Indiana Pacers @ Miami Heat
Fri Oct 30 · 8:00 PM EDT		under234.8-4.7239.5⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
#4Los Angeles Lakers @ Golden State Warriors
Fri Oct 30 · 10:00 PM EDT		under230.5-4.0234.5⏳ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
#5Cleveland Cavaliers @ Atlanta Hawks
Thu Oct 29 · 8:00 PM EDT		under233.9-3.6237.5⏳ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Forward-test hypothesis only. The value board is not a system, not bets, not edges. Judged after ~100 graded plays with CLV tracked. Bar: 5+ pt model-vs-line gap. Every locked pick is graded from game one β€” see the Record tab.
How to read: "Model says" is who the model thinks wins and by how much. "Gap vs book" is model minus book line. "Lean" is the side the gap points to, with its line. A πŸ“ flag means the gap cleared the 5-point bar.
DateGameModel sideGap vs bookBook lineBasis
Fri Oct 30CHA @ WSHCharlotte Hornets-8.71.5early look β€” not official
Fri Oct 30DET @ BKNDetroit Pistons-8.27.5early look β€” not official

All games, model vs line

GameModel saysBook lineGap vs bookLeanModel total ptsBook totalTotal gap
CLE @ ATL+1.1 ATL-1.5-0.4CLE +1.5233.9237.5-3.6
SAC @ NO+8.6 NO-6.5+2.1NO -6.5232.6235.5-2.9
MEM @ POR+7.4 POR-7.5-0.1MEM +7.5232.2232.5-0.3
CHA @ WSH-10.2 CHA1.5-8.7CHA -1.5 πŸ“229.1222.5+6.6
CHI @ BOS+17.1 BOS-15.5+1.6BOS -15.5230.2231.5-1.3
DET @ BKN-15.7 DET7.5-8.2DET -7.5 πŸ“223.1221.5+1.6
NY @ PHI-2.6 NY-1.5-4.1NY +1.5225.9228.5-2.6
ORL @ TOR+8.2 TOR-5.5+2.7TOR -5.5226.7224.5+2.2
IND @ MIA+8.7 MIA-5.5+3.2MIA -5.5234.8239.5-4.7
HOU @ DAL-8.9 HOU5.5-3.4HOU -5.5227.6227.5+0.1
LAC @ MIN+6.2 MIN-7.5-1.2LAC +7.5226.8221.5+5.3
LAL @ GS-2.1 LAL1.5-0.7LAL -1.5230.5234.5-4.0
DEN @ PHX-2.2 DEN4.5+2.3PHX +4.5228.3229.5-1.2
How to read: this tab shows where the betting money is going β€” tickets (how many bets) vs money (how many dollars) on each side. It does not predict winners and never feeds the model. A side with far more money than tickets is where the big bets are.
🌊 Money flow day by day
consensus league avg ticket% vs handle% on the favorite Β· gap = sharp divergence
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%10/2110/2210/2310/2410/2510/2610/2710/2810/2910/30Tickets on fav 10/21: 67.6%Tickets on fav 10/22: 78.8%Tickets on fav 10/23: 82.5%Tickets on fav 10/24: 81.9%Tickets on fav 10/25: 89.2%Tickets on fav 10/26: 68.2%Handle on fav 10/21: 59.0%Handle on fav 10/22: 67.0%Handle on fav 10/23: 77.7%Handle on fav 10/24: 72.9%Handle on fav 10/25: 86.0%Handle on fav 10/26: 65.8%Tickets on favHandle on fav

10/21: 11g 3 lopsided 3 sharp-div 6 2-src Β· 10/22: 2g 1 lopsided 1 sharp-div 2 2-src Β· 10/23: 12g 9 lopsided 2 sharp-div 11 2-src Β· 10/24: 8g 5 lopsided 2 sharp-div 8 2-src Β· 10/25: 7g 5 lopsided 2 sharp-div 7 2-src Β· 10/26: 9g 4 lopsided 6 sharp-div 7 2-src Β· 10/27: 4g 2 lopsided 1 sharp-div 4 2-src Β· 10/28: 12g 6 lopsided 5 sharp-div 9 2-src Β· 10/29: 2g 1 lopsided 2 sharp-div 0 2-src Β· 10/30: 4g 1 lopsided 3 sharp-div 0 2-src

10 days of splits so far β€” early-season averages are thin; a 2-game day swings wildly.

Lopsided = a side drew 75%+ of the money. Sharp-div = handle% βˆ’ tickets% β‰₯ 15 on a team. Favorite = negative-moneyline side (pick’em games excluded from favorite averages). 2-src = games covered by both sources that day.

πŸ“Š Bet differential day by day
tickets vs money vs over% β€” and the money-minus-tickets gap
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%10/2110/2210/2310/2410/2510/2610/2710/2810/2910/30Tickets (bets%) 10/21: 67.6%Tickets (bets%) 10/22: 78.8%Tickets (bets%) 10/23: 82.5%Tickets (bets%) 10/24: 81.9%Tickets (bets%) 10/25: 89.2%Tickets (bets%) 10/26: 68.2%Money (handle%) 10/21: 59.0%Money (handle%) 10/22: 67.0%Money (handle%) 10/23: 77.7%Money (handle%) 10/24: 72.9%Money (handle%) 10/25: 86.0%Money (handle%) 10/26: 65.8%Over% 10/21: 45.8%Over% 10/22: 84.0%Over% 10/23: 67.2%Over% 10/24: 47.5%Over% 10/25: 58.4%Over% 10/26: 37.1%Over% 10/27: 58.2%Over% 10/28: 46.0%Tickets (bets%)Money (handle%)Over%
Bet differential (handle% βˆ’ tickets%)
positive = money heavier than tickets
+11.8%βˆ’11.8%10/21: -8.6pp10/21-8.610/22: -11.8pp10/22-11.810/23: -4.8pp10/23-4.810/24: -9.0pp10/24-9.010/25: -3.2pp10/25-3.210/26: -2.4pp10/26-2.4
πŸ“… Day detail
every game that day β€” consensus of the reporting sources

Day

Sources: 2 src = both books reported; Ξ” = max ticket% disagreement between the sources on the moneyline sides. 1 src = only one book reported β€” consensus equals that book, treated as single-book, not consensus.

Move = biggest intraday handle swing on a moneyline side (earliest β†’ latest snapshot of the day, consensus); ⚑ = 10+ point swing. 🧊 = frozen line: handle swung 10+ pts while the cleatz moneyline price moved ≀2 pts of implied probability over the same window. n snaps = snapshots feeding the move. Numbers refresh every ~30 min through the day.

πŸ€ Team splits
that team's consensus tickets vs money, day by day

Team

Splits: consensus: cleatz.com + wiseguyteam.com (DraftKings). Display only β€” not a model input.

How to read: each row is one locked pick, graded after the game. Spread = did the pick cover the book line? Winner = did the picked team win? Totals = over or under the book total? W–L–P = wins, losses, pushes (ties).
Against the spread locked spread pick vs locked book line
36–26–0

58.1% (pushes excluded)

Winner (moneyline) locked winner pick vs actual winner
41–21

66.1%

Totals locked total pick vs locked book total
28–34–0

45.2% (pushes excluded)

Best Bets – Spread top-5 spread picks per slate
22–14–0

61.1% (pushes excluded)

Best Bets – Winner top-5 winner picks per slate
24–12

66.7%

Best Bets – Totals top-5 totals picks per slate
18–18–0

50.0% (pushes excluded)

Record is real and graded from game one. One honest caveat: early-season games were graded on priors-heavy ratings (paper-trade phase until ~15–20 games/team, early Dec) β€” the inputs were thin, the grades are not. 62 graded Β· 2 voided (excluded) Β· 0 locked, awaiting final. Basis is fixed: locked pick vs locked line, append-only, never moved mid-flight. Best Bets records track the same locked rows β€” top-5 reads per market per slate β€” on the identical basis.

Game log

DateGameSpread pickSpreadTotal pickTotalWinner pickWinnerBB
Oct 21ATL @ ORL
132–125		ATL +2.5WUnder 233.5LORLLβ€”
Oct 21MIN @ MIA
131–106		MIA -1.5LUnder 240.5WMIALβ˜…T
Oct 21CHA @ BKN
110–103		CHA -1.5WOver 219.5LCHAWβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 21CHI @ TOR
92–135		TOR -10.5WUnder 237.5WTORWβ˜…M β˜…T
Oct 21UTAH @ MEM
103–123		MEM -1.5WUnder 240.5WMEMWβ˜…S
Oct 21IND @ NO
123–120		NO +2.5LUnder 238.5LNOLβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 21DAL @ HOU
110–128		HOU -10.5WUnder 230.5LHOUWβ˜…S β˜…M
Oct 21GS @ LAL
105–127		GS +6.5LUnder 233.5WLALWβ€”
Oct 21PHX @ POR
83–124		PHX +2.5LUnder 231.5WPORWβ˜…T
Oct 21SAC @ LAC
96–121		LAC -5.5WOver 226.5LLACWβ˜…S β˜…M
Oct 22CLE @ PHI
106–114		CLE +2.5LUnder 236.5WCLELβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 22DEN @ OKC
84–96		OKC -7.5WUnder 236.5WOKCWβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 23ATL @ CHA
128–81		CHA +2.5LOver 226.5LCHALβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 23DAL @ IND
121–105		DAL +7.5WUnder 239.5WINDLβ˜…S β˜…T
Oct 23MIN @ ORL
115–93		MIN +1.5WUnder 234.5WMINWβ˜…T
Oct 23TOR @ WSH
112–102		TOR -9.5WUnder 236.5WTORWβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 23DET @ MIA
128–111		DET -1.5WUnder 234.5LDETWβ€”
Oct 23HOU @ SA
114–110		SA -4.5LOver 224.5LSALβ˜…M
Oct 23NO @ UTAH
119–120		NO +1.5WUnder 238.5LNOLβ˜…S
Oct 23MEM @ GS
111–108		GS -4.5LUnder 236.5WGSLβ˜…M β˜…T
Oct 23LAC @ LAL
117–125		LAC +8.5WOver 225.5WLALWβ˜…S
Oct 23POR @ SAC
128–120		SAC +9.5WUnder 231.5LPORWβ˜…M
Oct 24MIA @ CHA
110–115		CHA +4.5WOver 228.5LCHAWβ˜…S β˜…T
Oct 24BKN @ CLE
121–125		CLE -11.5LUnder 228.5LCLEWβ˜…M
Oct 24MIL @ PHI
116–127		MIL +13.5WUnder 234.5LPHIWβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 24WSH @ CHI
124–120		CHI -1.5LUnder 244.5WCHILβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 24SA @ DAL
122–106		DAL +14.5LOver 229.5LSAWβ˜…S β˜…M
Oct 24HOU @ ATL
121–114		ATL +1.5LOver 227.5WATLLβ€”
Oct 24NO @ DEN
135–141		NO +11.5WUnder 239.5LDENWβ˜…M β˜…T
Oct 24GS @ PHX
122–131		GS +9.5WOver 221.5WPHXWβ˜…S β˜…T
Oct 25LAL @ UTAH
132–123		LAL -6.5WUnder 237.5LLALWβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 25IND @ BKN
136–109		BKN +6.5LUnder 231.5LINDWβ˜…S β˜…T
Oct 25ORL @ NY
111–102		NY -6.5LOver 224.5LNYLβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 25TOR @ MIN
94–117		TOR +3.5LUnder 228.5WMINWβ˜…T
Oct 25LAC @ OKC
101–108		LAC +16.5WUnder 224.5WOKCWβ˜…S β˜…M
Oct 25DET @ PHI
106–93		DET -1.5WUnder 228.5WDETWβ˜…S β˜…M
Oct 25MEM @ SAC
123–112		MEM -3.5WUnder 234.5LMEMWβ˜…M β˜…T
Oct 26WSH @ CHA
103–110		CHA -2.5WOver 227.5LCHAWβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 26MIN @ CLE
125–127		MIN +3.5WUnder 234.5LMINLβ˜…S
Oct 26CHI @ BOS
99–134		BOS -13.5WUnder 233.5WBOSWβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 26DAL @ MIA
113–109		MIA -7.5LUnder 240.5WMIALβ˜…M β˜…T
Oct 26IND @ MIL
102–110		MIL +3.5WUnder 238.5WMILWβ˜…S β˜…T
Oct 26PHX @ OKC
114–125		OKC -8.5WOver 221.5WOKCWβ˜…S β˜…M
Oct 26ATL @ HOU
110–120		ATL +4.5LUnder 229.5LHOUWβ€”
Oct 26MEM @ UTAH
110–105		MEM -1.5WOver 237.5LMEMWβ€”
Oct 26GS @ DEN
134–114		DEN -7.5LUnder 236.5LDENLβ˜…M β˜…T
Oct 27BKN @ BOS
124–125		BOS -12.5LUnder 222.5LBOSWβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 27DET @ NY
97–111		DET +3.5LOver 219.5LDETLβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 27SAC @ SA
103–130		SA -18.5WUnder 232.5LSAWβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 27POR @ LAL
136–129		LAL -1.5LUnder 233.5LLALLβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 28MIA @ ATL
129–117		ATL -2.5LUnder 241.5LATLLβ˜…S β˜…T
Oct 28WSH @ CLE
111–121		CLE -9.5WUnder 240.5WCLEWβ˜…S β˜…M β˜…T
Oct 28CHA @ DET
89–97		CHA +7.5LOver 212.5LDETWβ˜…T
Oct 28PHI @ IND
114–109		IND +7.5WUnder 234.5WPHIWβ˜…T
Oct 28ORL @ TOR
99–129		TOR -4.5WOver 224.5WTORWβ€”
Oct 28NY @ CHI
133–127		NY -6.5LUnder 232.5LNYWβ˜…S β˜…M
Oct 28HOU @ MIL
132–100		HOU -8.5WUnder 226.5LHOUWβ˜…M
Oct 28GS @ MIN
119–114		MIN -4.5LOver 227.5WMINLβ˜…S
Oct 28DEN @ NO
104–91		DEN -4.5WUnder 240.5WDENWβ˜…T
Oct 28SA @ UTAH
117–111		UTAH +14.5WOver 232.5LSAWβ˜…M
Oct 28OKC @ DAL
96–120		OKC -5.5LUnder 228.5WOKCLβ˜…S β˜…M
Oct 28LAL @ LAC
103–87		LAL +1.5WOver 225.5LLACLβ€”
Oct 21MIL @ WSH
voided β€” excluded from record		Locked while CHO/BRK/PHO/WAS silently ran 0.0 net ratings (BREF2ESPN mapping bug) β€” corrupted basis. Graded 2-1 (WSH 128-116: spread WSH -4.
Oct 23NY @ BOS
voided — excluded from record		Locked while NYK silently ran 0.0 net rating (BREF2ESPN mapping bug — missing NYK→NY entry) — corrupted basis. Graded 2-1 (BOS 107-103: spre

Running record by week

WeekSpreadSpread runWinnerWinner runTotalsTotals run
Wk of Oct 1922–15–022–15–025–1225–1218–19–018–19–0
Wk of Oct 2614–11–036–26–016–941–2110–15–028–34–0
The core question

Not "are we smarter than the line." Instead: "what's in the line, and which part can we see through?"

line = efficiency truth + rest/B2B state + public shade + brand tax + key-number rounding + vig.
The model projects only the parts it can measure honestly (efficiency truth, schedule state) and keeps them separable from the parts it can't (shade, brand tax, vig) β€” so every gap vs the line can be asked which component is this?

Pick-lock rule

Picks lock 30 minutes before tipoff. At that moment the model's spread side, total side, and moneyline side are frozen together with the DraftKings spread, total, and moneyline as they stand then.

Efficiency core

Net rating (offensive βˆ’ defensive rating, pace-adjusted) blended: curr_w = min(1, gp/20) * 0.8 ; prior_w = 1 - curr_w. Prior = 2025-26 final ratings. HFA = 2.0 pts (walk-forward tested 2021-22–2024-25, pooled 1.99). Win chance from a bell curve, width 13.5 (untested).

Every factor beyond the efficiency core is walk-forward tested before wiring. Nothing enters the projection on theory alone. Rest/B2B edge is currently 0.0 β€” displayed, logged daily to the rest log for the future backtest, not priced in.

Honest limits

Team net ratings

Offense/defense = points per 100 possessions. Net rating = offense minus defense. Last-season weight = how much of the rating still comes from last season.

AbbrTeamNet ratingOffenseDefensePaceGamesLast-season weight
OKCOklahoma City Thunder+9.70117.1107.499.1580%
BOSBoston Celtics+8.07120.3112.395.5484%
SASan Antonio Spurs+7.92118.6110.799.9580%
DETDetroit Pistons+7.86116.9109.098.9580%
HOUHouston Rockets+7.16119.6112.496.8580%
NYNew York Knicks+5.24117.9112.797.4580%
MINMinnesota Timberwolves+5.06116.5111.5100.8580%
TORToronto Raptors+4.74115.4110.699.4484%
DENDenver Nuggets+3.86120.7116.898.3484%
CLECleveland Cavaliers+3.75118.4114.7100.3484%
LALLos Angeles Lakers+3.36119.2115.998.6580%
ATLAtlanta Hawks+2.90116.1113.2102.1580%
CHACharlotte Hornets+2.50116.4113.996.8580%
PORPortland Trail Blazers+1.97116.1114.2100.5388%
LACLos Angeles Clippers+0.77115.5114.797.1484%
PHIPhiladelphia 76ers+0.58113.7113.1100.3580%
MIAMiami Heat+0.26115.1114.8103.5580%
PHXPhoenix Suns-0.42114.8115.297.0388%
GSGolden State Warriors-0.84115.5116.498.8580%
ORLOrlando Magic-1.43113.1114.5100.5484%
MEMMemphis Grizzlies-3.38113.6117.0101.0484%
DALDallas Mavericks-3.84111.7115.5101.4580%
NONew Orleans Pelicans-4.66113.9118.6100.5484%
INDIndiana Pacers-6.28111.2117.5101.3580%
CHIChicago Bulls-7.10111.7118.8103.4580%
MILMilwaukee Bucks-7.22112.3119.598.7580%
UTAHUtah Jazz-8.08113.4121.5101.7580%
WSHWashington Wizards-9.80111.5121.3101.1580%
BKNBrooklyn Nets-10.14108.7118.997.9484%
SACSacramento Kings-11.30110.7122.099.4484%
Quarter wins + scoring only. No quarter spread or total lines exist in free sources, so there are no against-the-spread or over/under columns here β€” a quarter win is a quarter moneyline win. Overtime periods excluded. Display only β€” not a model input.

68 finished games since Oct 20. 34 tied quarters (counted as neither win nor loss). Click a header to sort.

Quarter records W-L per quarter, season to date

TeamGPQ1Q2Q3Q4All QQ win%
Toronto Raptors43-13-12-24-012-40.8%
Portland Trail Blazers31-23-03-01-1-18-30.7%
Houston Rockets54-13-1-13-1-12-2-112-50.7%
Minnesota Timberwolves54-13-24-12-2-113-60.7%
San Antonio Spurs52-34-13-22-0-311-60.6%
Los Angeles Lakers53-24-13-1-11-411-80.6%
Boston Celtics42-22-0-23-11-38-60.6%
Memphis Grizzlies41-33-12-23-19-70.6%
New York Knicks54-12-31-2-23-210-80.6%
Washington Wizards54-12-33-22-311-90.6%
Dallas Mavericks52-33-23-23-211-90.6%
Cleveland Cavaliers42-22-23-11-2-18-70.5%
Atlanta Hawks52-32-2-12-2-13-1-19-80.5%
Detroit Pistons53-20-4-13-24-110-90.5%
Indiana Pacers51-3-12-34-13-210-90.5%
Philadelphia 76ers51-3-11-3-14-13-29-90.5%
Golden State Warriors53-22-32-33-210-100.5%
Oklahoma City Thunder53-22-32-2-12-39-100.5%
Charlotte Hornets52-2-14-12-31-49-100.5%
Utah Jazz54-12-30-4-12-2-18-100.4%
New Orleans Pelicans41-33-13-10-47-90.4%
Los Angeles Clippers42-21-31-33-17-90.4%
Miami Heat52-2-12-31-42-2-17-110.4%
Denver Nuggets43-11-30-42-26-100.4%
Milwaukee Bucks52-32-32-31-47-130.3%
Orlando Magic41-31-31-2-12-25-100.3%
Brooklyn Nets42-20-3-11-32-25-100.3%
Sacramento Kings42-21-31-31-2-15-100.3%
Phoenix Suns30-31-21-1-11-1-13-70.3%
Chicago Bulls50-53-1-10-4-12-35-130.3%

Quarter scoring points for / against per quarter, per game

TeamGPQ1 PFQ1 PAQ2 PFQ2 PAQ3 PFQ3 PAQ4 PFQ4 PATot PFTot PA
Atlanta Hawks529.429.832.629.427.429.230.826.8120.2115.2
Boston Celtics428.226.529.225.833.025.827.232.0117.8110.0
Brooklyn Nets427.528.027.232.826.031.831.829.5112.5122.0
Charlotte Hornets523.825.829.826.625.227.022.228.8101.0108.2
Chicago Bulls524.234.032.428.028.637.828.830.4114.0130.2
Cleveland Cavaliers432.030.229.526.829.528.025.229.8116.2114.8
Dallas Mavericks531.429.627.228.829.428.226.025.4114.0112.0
Denver Nuggets430.027.024.528.524.532.228.024.0107.0111.8
Detroit Pistons532.224.619.826.828.627.629.224.4109.8103.4
Golden State Warriors530.028.827.228.631.433.229.028.8117.6119.4
Houston Rockets529.827.032.222.230.629.230.430.4123.0108.8
Indiana Pacers528.631.426.830.832.023.627.629.0115.0114.8
Los Angeles Clippers428.526.023.828.229.029.525.224.2106.5108.0
Los Angeles Lakers530.633.036.025.632.626.624.028.4123.2113.6
Memphis Grizzlies429.228.533.026.029.529.225.023.2116.8107.0
Miami Heat530.030.828.231.025.231.429.627.6113.0120.8
Milwaukee Bucks526.425.626.233.234.835.026.030.4113.4124.2
Minnesota Timberwolves529.225.428.627.630.623.429.628.6118.0105.0
New Orleans Pelicans428.832.530.225.531.827.023.233.2114.0118.2
New York Knicks527.828.225.424.627.226.429.430.4109.8109.6
Oklahoma City Thunder528.827.026.824.228.428.624.224.8108.2104.6
Orlando Magic424.828.527.234.024.828.230.228.8107.0119.5
Philadelphia 76ers524.428.829.430.227.425.029.623.4110.8107.4
Phoenix Suns320.333.729.330.734.735.025.024.3109.3123.7
Portland Trail Blazers334.027.732.331.037.727.725.324.3129.3110.7
Sacramento Kings429.833.028.033.824.833.025.225.8107.8125.5
San Antonio Spurs529.631.630.827.428.627.425.222.4114.2108.8
Toronto Raptors432.525.228.825.826.027.530.224.0117.5102.5
Utah Jazz532.427.625.832.227.033.226.024.8111.2117.8
Washington Wizards527.427.427.230.830.227.428.830.2113.6115.8

πŸ”„ Roster moves trades, signings, waivers

Newest first. πŸ”” marks moves flagged as notable.

2026-10-28 Β· LAL β€” Waived F AK Okereke. Signed C Lawson Lovering to a two-way contract.
2026-10-27 Β· MIN β€” Signed F Enrique Freeman to a two-way contract.
2026-10-23 Β· SAC β€” Signed G Sean Pedulla to a two-way contract.
2026-10-23 Β· NY β€” Waived G Kevin McCullar Jr..
2026-10-19 Β· SAC β€” Waived G Adam Flagler.
πŸ”” 2026-10-19 Β· PHX β€” Signed F Oso Ighodaro to a multiyear contract extension. Claimed F Drew Timme off waivers. Converted C Duop Reath's contract to a two-way contract. Waived F CJ Huntley and G Koby Brea.
2026-10-19 Β· OKC β€” Re-signed G Cason Wallace to a rookie-scale contract extension.
2026-10-19 Β· MIL β€” Waived G Kevin Porter Jr.
2026-10-19 Β· MEM β€” Waived G Walter Clayton Jr. and G Micah Peavy.
2026-10-19 Β· LAL β€” Waived F Dalton Knecht.
2026-10-19 Β· HOU β€” Waived Sean Pedulla. Converted Fs Oscar Tshiebwe and Julian Phillips's contract to two-way contracts.
2026-10-19 Β· DAL β€” Waived F Dwight Powell.
2026-10-19 Β· CHA β€” Signed G Brandon Miller to a multiyear contract extension.
2026-10-17 Β· WSH β€” Waived Gs Nolan Hickman, Trevor Keels, Alondes Williams and F Chris Livington.
πŸ”” 2026-10-17 Β· UTAH β€” Claimed C Tony Bradley off waivers. Converted the contract of F Harrison Ingram to a twpo-way contract. Waived C Jonas Aidoo and G Tamar Bates.
2026-10-17 Β· TOR β€” Converted the contract of C Nate Bittle to a two-way contract. Waived Gs Nimari Burnett, Jalen Celestine, Tyreke Key, F Tyson Degenhart and C Jamarion Sharp.
2026-10-17 Β· SAC β€” Waived Gs Elfrid Payton and Tristen Newton. Waived F Viktor Lakhin.
2026-10-17 Β· POR β€” Waived F Jeremy Sochan.
2026-10-17 Β· PHX β€” Waived G Kennedy Chandler and Fs Haywood Highsmith and Phillip Wheeler.
2026-10-17 Β· PHI β€” Waived Fs Cris Carroll, Taye Fields and Dillon Jones. Waived G Jameer Nelson Jr.
2026-10-17 Β· ORL β€” Waived Fs Malaki Branham and Kevin Knox II. Waived G JD Davison.
2026-10-17 Β· OKC β€” Waived F Buddy Boeheim, C Christoph Tilly and Gs. Nate Johnson, Dariq Whitehead and Lamar Wilderson.
2026-10-17 Β· NY β€” Waived Gs Bruce Brown and Dink Pate.
2026-10-17 Β· NO β€” Waived F Jalon Moore.
2026-10-17 Β· MIN β€” Waived Fs Enrique Freeman, KJ Martin, Norchad Omier, Drew Timme and G Antonio Reeves.
2026-10-17 Β· MIL β€” Waived Fs Johni Broome, Pete Nance, G Marcus Garrett and C Jake Stephens.
2026-10-17 Β· MIA β€” Waived Fs Ezra Ausar and Gabe Madsen. Waived G Bez Mbeng and C Kylor Kelley.
2026-10-17 Β· MEM β€” Waived F Zach Cleveland.
2026-10-17 Β· LAL β€” Waived C Rafael Castro and F Niwa Tait-Jones.
2026-10-17 Β· LAC β€” Signed G Cam Christie to a two-way contract. Waived Gs Miye Oni, Jahmyl Telfort and Blake Wesley.
2026-10-17 Β· IND β€” Waived Cs Keba Keita, Rienk Mast and F James Johnson.
2026-10-17 Β· HOU β€” Waived Gs Bryce Harris, Caleb McConnell and F Cameron Matthews.