π NBA Model 2026-27 Β· paper trade Β· generated 2026-10-29 19:20 ET
How to read a card: the first sentence is the conclusion β who the model picks, what the book line says, and where they disagree. The numbers below are the inputs. Paper-trade phase: ratings run on 2025-26 priors + early-season noise. Rest/B2B shown and logged, not priced. Value flags are hypotheses, never bets. Quarter records are season history, not a prediction.
Cleveland Cavaliers @ Atlanta Hawks
Thu Oct 29 Β· 8:00 PM EDT Β· 10/29 - 8:00 PM EDT
Model says Atlanta Hawks by 1.1. The book line says Atlanta Hawks by 1.5. So the model leans Cleveland Cavaliers +1.5. Total: model 233.9, book 237.5 β leans under. The injury shadow disagrees β it leans Atlanta Hawks. Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 CLE 2-2 vs ATL 2-3 Β· Q2 CLE 2-2 vs ATL 2-2-1 Β· Q3 CLE 3-1 vs ATL 2-2-1 Β· Q4 CLE 1-2-1 vs ATL 3-1-1
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Against the spread: CLE +1.5
Total points: Under 237.5
Winner: ATL (-118) Β· 53%
β³ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Model says Atlanta Hawks by 1.1 Β· win chance 53%
Model total points 233.9 (gap -3.6 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread -1.5 Β· total 237.5 moneyline -102 / -118
Model margin built from efficiency -0.86 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) -0.4 pts vs book line
The model makes Atlanta Hawks +1.1 (53% to win outright). DK has Atlanta Hawks -1.5. Model-vs-line gap: -0.4 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-0.86) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22β2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
β³ Live model pick: ATS CLE; Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Cleveland Cavaliers β strengths & weaknesses
Cleveland Cavaliers (CLE) ranks #10 at +3.8 net β 118.4 offense, 114.7 defense, 100.3 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
β top-third offense (118.4 pts/100)
Atlanta Hawks β strengths & weaknesses
Atlanta Hawks (ATL) ranks #12 at +2.9 net β 116.1 offense, 113.2 defense, 102.1 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
β top-third defense (113.2 allowed/100)
β plays fast (102.1 pace)
The exploitation map
Cleveland Cavaliers's elite offense runs into Atlanta Hawks's lockdown defense β strength on strength.
Rest gap: Cleveland Cavaliers and Atlanta Hawks on the second night of a back-to-back. The model prices rest at 0.0 β this is a hole in the number, not an edge.
Torque's read
Strength on strength decides this one β the elite-offense-vs-lockdown-defense battle is the game.
The biggest swing factor is Mouhamed Gueye (Out for Atlanta Hawks β Foot Fracture).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β the price is the game.
Rest
Cleveland Cavaliers: 0d rest (second night of a back-to-back β NOT priced into the model)
Atlanta Hawks: 0d rest (second night of a back-to-back β NOT priced into the model)
Atlanta Hawks: Mouhamed Gueye (Out β Foot Fracture (return 2026-11-20)); Henri Veesaar (Out β Knee (return 2027-07-01)).
Line movement
Spread steady at -1.5
Model total 233.9 vs listed 237.5 (edge -3.6) β the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Sacramento Kings @ New Orleans Pelicans
Thu Oct 29 Β· 8:00 PM EDT Β· 10/29 - 8:00 PM EDT
Model says New Orleans Pelicans by 8.6. The book line says New Orleans Pelicans by 6.5. So the model leans New Orleans Pelicans -6.5. Total: model 232.6, book 234.5 β leans under. The injury shadow disagrees β it leans Sacramento Kings. Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 SAC 2-2 vs NO 1-3 Β· Q2 SAC 1-3 vs NO 3-1 Β· Q3 SAC 1-3 vs NO 3-1 Β· Q4 SAC 1-2-1 vs NO 0-4
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Against the spread: NO -6.5
Total points: Under 234.5
Winner: NO (-238) Β· 74%
β³ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Model says New Orleans Pelicans by 8.6 Β· win chance 74%
Model total points 232.6 (gap -1.9 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread -6.5 Β· total 234.5 moneyline +195 / -238
Model margin built from efficiency +6.64 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) +2.1 pts vs book line
Rest days SAC 1d rest Β· NO 0d rest π B2B
Efficiency (net rating) SAC -11.3 Β· NO -4.7 last season counts for 84%
Model says Portland Trail Blazers by 7.4. The book line says Portland Trail Blazers by 7.5. So the model leans Memphis Grizzlies +7.5. Total: model 232.2, book 232.5 β leans under. The injury shadow disagrees β it leans Portland Trail Blazers. Locks at 9:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 MEM 1-3 vs POR 1-2 Β· Q2 MEM 3-1 vs POR 3-0 Β· Q3 MEM 2-2 vs POR 3-0 Β· Q4 MEM 3-1 vs POR 1-1-1
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Against the spread: MEM +7.5
Total points: Under 232.5
Winner: POR (-290) Β· 71%
β³ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Model says Portland Trail Blazers by 7.4 Β· win chance 71%
Model total points 232.2 (gap -0.3 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread -7.5 Β· total 232.5 moneyline +235 / -290
Model margin built from efficiency +5.39 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) -0.1 pts vs book line
Rest days MEM 2d rest Β· POR 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating) MEM -3.4 Β· POR +2.0 last season counts for 88%
The model makes Portland Trail Blazers +7.4 (71% to win outright). DK has Portland Trail Blazers -7.5. Model-vs-line gap: -0.1 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (+5.39) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22β2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
β³ Live model pick: ATS MEM; Locks at 9:30 PM ET.
Memphis Grizzlies β strengths & weaknesses
Memphis Grizzlies (MEM) ranks #21 at -3.4 net β 113.6 offense, 117.0 defense, 101.0 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
β plays fast (101.0 pace)
β bottom-third offense (113.6 pts/100)
β bottom-third defense (117.0 allowed/100)
Portland Trail Blazers β strengths & weaknesses
Portland Trail Blazers (POR) ranks #14 at +2.0 net β 116.1 offense, 114.2 defense, 100.5 pace. 3 games played; priors carry 88% of the blend.
No clear strengths or weaknesses by the tercile test β a league-average profile.
The exploitation map
No clear cross-matchups by the tercile test β neither team's calling card lines up against the other's soft spot.
Torque's read
No single matchup dominates β this one is won in the margins.
The biggest swing factor is Chris Youngblood (Out for Portland Trail Blazers β Ankle Soreness).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β the price is the game.
Rest
Memphis Grizzlies: 2d rest
Portland Trail Blazers: 1d rest
Injuries
Portland Trail Blazers: Robert Williams III (Day-To-Day β Knee (return 2026-10-29)); Chris Youngblood (Out β Ankle Soreness (return 2026-10-29)); Shaedon Sharpe (Out β Knee Surgery (return 2027-03-02)).
Line movement
Spread steady at -7.5
Model total 232.2 vs listed 232.5 (edge -0.3) β the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Charlotte Hornets @ Washington Wizards
Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:00 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 7:00 PM EDT
Model says Charlotte Hornets by 10.2. The book line says Washington Wizards by 1.5. So the model leans Charlotte Hornets +1.5. Total: model 229.1, book 222.5 β leans over. Paper trade only β a test flag, not a bet.
Quarter records so far: Q1 CHA 2-2-1 vs WSH 4-1 Β· Q2 CHA 4-1 vs WSH 2-3 Β· Q3 CHA 2-3 vs WSH 3-2 Β· Q4 CHA 1-4 vs WSH 2-3
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 6:30 PM ET
Against the spread: CHA +1.5
Total points: Over 222.5
Winner: CHA (-110) Β· 77%
β³ Locks at 6:30 PM ET
Model says Charlotte Hornets by 10.2 Β· win chance 77%
Model total points 229.1 (gap +6.6 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread -1.5 Β· total 222.5 moneyline -110 / -110
Model margin built from efficiency -12.17 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) -11.7 pts vs book line
Rest days CHA 1d rest Β· WSH 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating) CHA +2.5 Β· WSH -9.8 last season counts for 80%
π PAPER TRADE flag: the model leans Charlotte Hornets by 11.7 pts vs the book line (5+ point bar). A test flag only β not a bet, not an edge.
π Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Washington Wizards -10.2 (23% to win outright). DK has Washington Wizards -1.5. Model-vs-line gap: -11.7 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-12.17) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22β2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
β³ Live model pick: ATS CHA; Locks at 6:30 PM ET.
Charlotte Hornets β strengths & weaknesses
Charlotte Hornets (CHA) ranks #13 at +2.5 net β 116.4 offense, 113.9 defense, 96.8 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
No clear strengths or weaknesses by the tercile test β a league-average profile.
Washington Wizards β strengths & weaknesses
Washington Wizards (WSH) ranks #28 at -9.8 net β 111.5 offense, 121.3 defense, 101.1 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
β plays fast (101.1 pace)
β bottom-third offense (111.5 pts/100)
β bottom-third defense (121.3 allowed/100)
The exploitation map
Pace clash: Washington Wizards wants it fast (101.1) while Charlotte Hornets slows it down (96.8).
Torque's read
This one is won or lost in the pace battle β whoever imposes their tempo has the edge.
The biggest swing factor is Kon Knueppel (Out for Charlotte Hornets β Hamstring).
Verdict: the 11.7pt disagreement on Charlotte Hornets is the one to watch as the forward test β hypothesis only, never a bet.
Rest
Charlotte Hornets: 1d rest
Washington Wizards: 1d rest
Injuries
Charlotte Hornets: Dennis Schroder (Day-To-Day β Foot (return 2026-10-30)); Kon Knueppel (Out β Hamstring (return 2026-11-02)); Coby White (Out β Calf Strain (return 2026-11-02)); Grant Williams (Out β Hamstring (return 2026-11-02)).
Washington Wizards: Tre Johnson (Day-To-Day β Achilles Soreness (return 2026-10-30)); Justin Champagnie (Out β Foot Not Specified (return 2027-02-25)); Tristan Vukcevic (Out β Hip Pinched Nerve (return 2026-11-02)); Jamir Watkins (Out β Knee Surgery (return 2027-04-02)).
Line movement
Spread +1.5 β -1.5
Model total 229.1 vs listed 222.5 (edge +6.6) β the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Chicago Bulls @ Boston Celtics
Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:30 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 7:30 PM EDT
Model says Boston Celtics by 17.1. The book line says Boston Celtics by 15.5. So the model leans Boston Celtics -15.5. Total: model 230.2, book 233.5 β leans under. Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 CHI 0-5 vs BOS 2-2 Β· Q2 CHI 3-1-1 vs BOS 2-0-2 Β· Q3 CHI 0-4-1 vs BOS 3-1 Β· Q4 CHI 2-3 vs BOS 1-3
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Against the spread: BOS -15.5
Total points: Under 233.5
Winner: BOS (-850) Β· 90%
β³ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Model says Boston Celtics by 17.1 Β· win chance 90%
Model total points 230.2 (gap -3.3 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread -15.5 Β· total 233.5 moneyline +575 / -850
Model margin built from efficiency +15.08 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) +1.6 pts vs book line
Rest days CHI 1d rest Β· BOS 2d rest
Efficiency (net rating) CHI -7.1 Β· BOS +8.1 last season counts for 84%
The model makes Boston Celtics +17.1 (90% to win outright). DK has Boston Celtics -15.5. Model-vs-line gap: +1.6 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (+15.08) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22β2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
β³ Live model pick: ATS BOS; Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Chicago Bulls β strengths & weaknesses
Chicago Bulls (CHI) ranks #25 at -7.1 net β 111.7 offense, 118.8 defense, 103.4 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
β plays fast (103.4 pace)
β bottom-third offense (111.7 pts/100)
β bottom-third defense (118.8 allowed/100)
Boston Celtics β strengths & weaknesses
Boston Celtics (BOS) ranks #2 at +8.1 net β 120.3 offense, 112.3 defense, 95.5 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
β top-third offense (120.3 pts/100)
β top-third defense (112.3 allowed/100)
The exploitation map
Boston Celtics's top-third offense (120.3 pts/100) against Chicago Bulls's bottom-third defense (118.8 allowed) is the most direct exploitation on the board.
Pace clash: Chicago Bulls wants it fast (103.4) while Boston Celtics slows it down (95.5).
Torque's read
The game is decided where the best offense meets the worst defense β that's the matchup that matters most.
The biggest swing factor is Patrick Williams (Out for Chicago Bulls β Groin Soreness).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β the price is the game.
Rest
Chicago Bulls: 1d rest
Boston Celtics: 2d rest
Injuries
Chicago Bulls: Patrick Williams (Out β Groin Soreness (return 2026-10-30)); Jalen Smith (Day-To-Day β Finger (return 2026-10-30)); Tobe Awaka (Day-To-Day β Ankle (return 2026-10-30)); Nic Claxton (Out β Hamstring (return 2026-11-04)).
Boston Celtics: Devin Carter (Out β Illness (return 2026-11-08)).
Line movement
Spread -11.5 β -15.5
Model total 230.2 vs listed 233.5 (edge -3.3) β the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Detroit Pistons @ Brooklyn Nets
Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:30 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 7:30 PM EDT
Model says Detroit Pistons by 15.7. The book line says Detroit Pistons by 7.5. So the model leans Detroit Pistons -7.5. Total: model 223.1, book 221.5 β leans over. Paper trade only β a test flag, not a bet.
Quarter records so far: Q1 DET 3-2 vs BKN 2-2 Β· Q2 DET 0-4-1 vs BKN 0-3-1 Β· Q3 DET 3-2 vs BKN 1-3 Β· Q4 DET 4-1 vs BKN 2-2
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Against the spread: DET -7.5
Total points: Over 221.5
Winner: DET (-258) Β· 88%
β³ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Model says Detroit Pistons by 15.7 Β· win chance 88%
Model total points 223.1 (gap +1.6 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread 7.5 Β· total 221.5 moneyline -258 / +210
Model margin built from efficiency -17.71 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) -8.2 pts vs book line
Rest days DET 1d rest Β· BKN 2d rest
Efficiency (net rating) DET +7.9 Β· BKN -10.1 last season counts for 84%
π PAPER TRADE flag: the model leans Detroit Pistons by 8.2 pts vs the book line (5+ point bar). A test flag only β not a bet, not an edge.
π Full write-up
The model's read
The model makes Brooklyn Nets -15.7 (12% to win outright). DK has Detroit Pistons -7.5. Model-vs-line gap: -8.2 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-17.71) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22β2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
β³ Live model pick: ATS DET; Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Detroit Pistons β strengths & weaknesses
Detroit Pistons (DET) ranks #4 at +7.9 net β 116.9 offense, 109.0 defense, 98.9 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
β top-third offense (116.9 pts/100)
β top-third defense (109.0 allowed/100)
Brooklyn Nets β strengths & weaknesses
Brooklyn Nets (BKN) ranks #29 at -10.1 net β 108.7 offense, 118.9 defense, 97.9 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
β bottom-third offense (108.7 pts/100)
β bottom-third defense (118.9 allowed/100)
The exploitation map
Detroit Pistons's top-third offense (116.9 pts/100) against Brooklyn Nets's bottom-third defense (118.9 allowed) is the most direct exploitation on the board.
Torque's read
The game is decided where the best offense meets the worst defense β that's the matchup that matters most.
The biggest swing factor is Jalen Duren (Out for Detroit Pistons β Hamstring Strain).
Verdict: the 8.2pt disagreement on Detroit Pistons is the one to watch as the forward test β hypothesis only, never a bet.
Rest
Detroit Pistons: 1d rest
Brooklyn Nets: 2d rest
Injuries
Detroit Pistons: Isaiah Joe (Day-To-Day β Hip Bruise (return 2026-10-30)); Jalen Duren (Out β Hamstring Strain (return 2026-11-09)).
Model total 223.1 vs listed 221.5 (edge +1.6) β the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
New York Knicks @ Philadelphia 76ers
Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:30 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 7:30 PM EDT
Model says New York Knicks by 2.6. The book line says New York Knicks by 1.5. So the model leans New York Knicks -1.5. Total: model 225.9, book 228.5 β leans under. Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 NY 4-1 vs PHI 1-3-1 Β· Q2 NY 2-3 vs PHI 1-3-1 Β· Q3 NY 1-2-2 vs PHI 4-1 Β· Q4 NY 3-2 vs PHI 3-2
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Against the spread: NY -1.5
Total points: Under 228.5
Winner: NY (-120) Β· 58%
β³ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Model says New York Knicks by 2.6 Β· win chance 58%
Model total points 225.9 (gap -2.6 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread 1.5 Β· total 228.5 moneyline -120 / +100
Model margin built from efficiency -4.60 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) -1.1 pts vs book line
Rest days NY 1d rest Β· PHI 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating) NY +5.2 Β· PHI +0.6 last season counts for 80%
The model makes Philadelphia 76ers -2.6 (42% to win outright). DK has New York Knicks -1.5. Model-vs-line gap: -1.1 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-4.60) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22β2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
β³ Live model pick: ATS NY; Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
New York Knicks β strengths & weaknesses
New York Knicks (NY) ranks #6 at +5.2 net β 117.9 offense, 112.7 defense, 97.4 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
β top-third offense (117.9 pts/100)
β top-third defense (112.7 allowed/100)
Philadelphia 76ers β strengths & weaknesses
Philadelphia 76ers (PHI) ranks #16 at +0.6 net β 113.7 offense, 113.1 defense, 100.3 pace. 5 games played; priors carry 80% of the blend.
β top-third defense (113.1 allowed/100)
The exploitation map
New York Knicks's elite offense runs into Philadelphia 76ers's lockdown defense β strength on strength.
Torque's read
Strength on strength decides this one β the elite-offense-vs-lockdown-defense battle is the game.
The biggest swing factor is Jose Alvarado (Out for New York Knicks β Ankle Sprain).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β the price is the game.
Rest
New York Knicks: 1d rest
Philadelphia 76ers: 1d rest
Injuries
New York Knicks: Jose Alvarado (Out β Ankle Sprain (return 2026-11-04)).
Philadelphia 76ers: Jabari Walker (Out β Knee Soreness (return 2026-10-31)); Jaylen Brown (Day-To-Day β Knee (return 2026-10-30)); Tacko Fall (Out β Quadriceps Strain (return 2026-11-04)); Dominick Barlow (Out β Back Fracture (return 2026-11-04)).
Line movement
Spread -1.5 β +1.5
Model total 225.9 vs listed 228.5 (edge -2.6) β the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Orlando Magic @ Toronto Raptors
Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:30 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 7:30 PM EDT
Model says Toronto Raptors by 8.2. The book line says Toronto Raptors by 5.5. So the model leans Toronto Raptors -5.5. Total: model 226.7, book 224.5 β leans over. The injury shadow disagrees β it leans Orlando Magic. Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 ORL 1-3 vs TOR 3-1 Β· Q2 ORL 1-3 vs TOR 3-1 Β· Q3 ORL 1-2-1 vs TOR 2-2 Β· Q4 ORL 2-2 vs TOR 4-0
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Against the spread: TOR -5.5
Total points: Over 224.5
Winner: TOR (-192) Β· 73%
β³ Locks at 7:00 PM ET
Model says Toronto Raptors by 8.2 Β· win chance 73%
Model total points 226.7 (gap +2.2 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread -5.5 Β· total 224.5 moneyline +160 / -192
Model margin built from efficiency +6.17 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) +2.7 pts vs book line
Rest days ORL 1d rest Β· TOR 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating) ORL -1.4 Β· TOR +4.7 last season counts for 84%
The model makes Toronto Raptors +8.2 (73% to win outright). DK has Toronto Raptors -5.5. Model-vs-line gap: +2.7 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (+6.17) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22β2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
β³ Live model pick: ATS TOR; Locks at 7:00 PM ET.
Orlando Magic β strengths & weaknesses
Orlando Magic (ORL) ranks #20 at -1.4 net β 113.1 offense, 114.5 defense, 100.5 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
β bottom-third offense (113.1 pts/100)
Toronto Raptors β strengths & weaknesses
Toronto Raptors (TOR) ranks #8 at +4.7 net β 115.4 offense, 110.6 defense, 99.4 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
β top-third defense (110.6 allowed/100)
The exploitation map
No clear cross-matchups by the tercile test β neither team's calling card lines up against the other's soft spot.
Torque's read
No single matchup dominates β this one is won in the margins.
The biggest swing factor is Jonathan Isaac (Out for Orlando Magic β Knee Not Specified).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β the price is the game.
Rest
Orlando Magic: 1d rest
Toronto Raptors: 1d rest
Injuries
Orlando Magic: Jonathan Isaac (Out β Knee Not Specified (return 2026-11-10)); Jalen Suggs (Out β Knee (return 2026-11-10)); Paolo Banchero (Out β Ankle Sprain (return 2026-11-22)); Noah Penda (Out β Hamstring Strain (return 2026-11-18)).
Toronto Raptors: Kawhi Leonard (Out β Knee Inflammation (return 2026-11-23)); Nate Bittle (Out β Foot Fracture (return 2026-11-02)).
Line movement
Spread -3.5 β -5.5
Model total 226.7 vs listed 224.5 (edge +2.2) β the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Indiana Pacers @ Miami Heat
Fri Oct 30 Β· 8:00 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 8:00 PM EDT
Model says Miami Heat by 8.7. The book line says Miami Heat by 7.5. So the model leans Miami Heat -7.5. Total: model 234.8, book 238.5 β leans under. The injury shadow disagrees β it leans Indiana Pacers. Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 IND 1-3-1 vs MIA 2-2-1 Β· Q2 IND 2-3 vs MIA 2-3 Β· Q3 IND 4-1 vs MIA 1-4 Β· Q4 IND 3-2 vs MIA 2-2-1
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Against the spread: MIA -7.5
Total points: Under 238.5
Winner: MIA (-250) Β· 74%
β³ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Model says Miami Heat by 8.7 Β· win chance 74%
Model total points 234.8 (gap -3.7 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread -7.5 Β· total 238.5 moneyline +205 / -250
Model margin built from efficiency +6.70 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) +1.2 pts vs book line
Rest days IND 1d rest Β· MIA 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating) IND -6.3 Β· MIA +0.3 last season counts for 80%
Model total 234.8 vs listed 238.5 (edge -3.7) β the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Houston Rockets @ Dallas Mavericks
Fri Oct 30 Β· 8:00 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 8:00 PM EDT
Model says Houston Rockets by 8.9. The book line says Houston Rockets by 5.5. So the model leans Houston Rockets -5.5. Total: model 227.6, book 227.5 β leans over. Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 HOU 4-1 vs DAL 2-3 Β· Q2 HOU 3-1-1 vs DAL 3-2 Β· Q3 HOU 3-1-1 vs DAL 3-2 Β· Q4 HOU 2-2-1 vs DAL 3-2
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Against the spread: HOU -5.5
Total points: Over 227.5
Winner: HOU (-192) Β· 75%
β³ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Model says Houston Rockets by 8.9 Β· win chance 75%
Model total points 227.6 (gap +0.1 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread 5.5 Β· total 227.5 moneyline -192 / +160
Model margin built from efficiency -10.90 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) -3.4 pts vs book line
Rest days HOU 1d rest Β· DAL 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating) HOU +7.2 Β· DAL -3.8 last season counts for 80%
Model total 227.6 vs listed 227.5 (edge +0.1) β the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Los Angeles Clippers @ Minnesota Timberwolves
Fri Oct 30 Β· 8:00 PM EDT Β· 10/30 - 8:00 PM EDT
Model says Minnesota Timberwolves by 6.2. The book line says Minnesota Timberwolves by 7.5. So the model leans Los Angeles Clippers +7.5. Total: model 226.8, book 221.5 β leans over. Locks at 7:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 LAC 2-2 vs MIN 4-1 Β· Q2 LAC 1-3 vs MIN 3-2 Β· Q3 LAC 1-3 vs MIN 4-1 Β· Q4 LAC 3-1 vs MIN 2-2-1
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Against the spread: LAC +7.5
Total points: Over 221.5
Winner: MIN (-238) Β· 68%
β³ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Model says Minnesota Timberwolves by 6.2 Β· win chance 68%
Model total points 226.8 (gap +5.3 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread -7.5 Β· total 221.5 moneyline +195 / -238
Model margin built from efficiency +4.25 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) -1.2 pts vs book line
Rest days LAC 1d rest Β· MIN 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating) LAC +0.8 Β· MIN +5.1 last season counts for 80%
Model says Los Angeles Lakers by 2.1. The book line says Los Angeles Lakers by 1.5. So the model leans Los Angeles Lakers -1.5. Total: model 230.5, book 234.5 β leans under. Locks at 9:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 LAL 3-2 vs GS 3-2 Β· Q2 LAL 4-1 vs GS 2-3 Β· Q3 LAL 3-1-1 vs GS 2-3 Β· Q4 LAL 1-4 vs GS 3-2
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Against the spread: LAL -1.5
Total points: Under 234.5
Winner: LAL (-125) Β· 56%
β³ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Model says Los Angeles Lakers by 2.1 Β· win chance 56%
Model total points 230.5 (gap -4.0 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread 1.5 Β· total 234.5 moneyline -125 / +105
Model margin built from efficiency -4.15 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) -0.7 pts vs book line
Rest days LAL 1d rest Β· GS 1d rest
Efficiency (net rating) LAL +3.4 Β· GS -0.8 last season counts for 80%
Model says Denver Nuggets by 2.2. The book line says Denver Nuggets by 4.5. So the model leans Phoenix Suns +4.5. Total: model 228.3, book 231.5 β leans under. The injury shadow disagrees β it leans Denver Nuggets. Locks at 9:30 PM ET.
Quarter records so far: Q1 DEN 3-1 vs PHX 0-3 Β· Q2 DEN 1-3 vs PHX 1-2 Β· Q3 DEN 0-4 vs PHX 1-1-1 Β· Q4 DEN 2-2 vs PHX 1-1-1
π― Model pick Β· β³ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Against the spread: PHX +4.5
Total points: Under 231.5
Winner: DEN (-170) Β· 56%
β³ Locks at 9:30 PM ET
Model says Denver Nuggets by 2.2 Β· win chance 56%
Model total points 228.3 (gap -3.2 vs book)
Book line (DraftKings) spread 4.5 Β· total 231.5 moneyline -170 / +142
Model margin built from efficiency -4.18 + home court 2.0 + rest (0.0, not priced) +2.3 pts vs book line
Rest days DEN 1d rest Β· PHX 3d rest
Efficiency (net rating) DEN +3.9 Β· PHX -0.4 last season counts for 88%
The model makes Phoenix Suns -2.2 (44% to win outright). DK has Denver Nuggets -4.5. Model-vs-line gap: +2.3 pts.
By the inputs, the margin comes from efficiency (-4.18) + home court (2.0, tested 2021-22β2024-25); rest is priced at 0.0 (display only).
β³ Live model pick: ATS PHX; Locks at 9:30 PM ET.
Denver Nuggets β strengths & weaknesses
Denver Nuggets (DEN) ranks #9 at +3.9 net β 120.7 offense, 116.8 defense, 98.3 pace. 4 games played; priors carry 84% of the blend.
β top-third offense (120.7 pts/100)
β bottom-third defense (116.8 allowed/100)
Phoenix Suns β strengths & weaknesses
Phoenix Suns (PHX) ranks #18 at -0.4 net β 114.8 offense, 115.2 defense, 97.0 pace. 3 games played; priors carry 88% of the blend.
No clear strengths or weaknesses by the tercile test β a league-average profile.
The exploitation map
No clear cross-matchups by the tercile test β neither team's calling card lines up against the other's soft spot.
Torque's read
No single matchup dominates β this one is won in the margins.
The biggest swing factor is Cameron Johnson (Out for Denver Nuggets β Ankle Sprain).
Verdict: nothing clears the bar β the price is the game.
Rest
Denver Nuggets: 1d rest
Phoenix Suns: 3d rest
Injuries
Denver Nuggets: Cameron Johnson (Out β Ankle Sprain (return 2026-10-30)); Spencer Jones (Out β Hamstring Not Specified (return 2026-11-02)); Alpha Diallo (Out β Personal (return 2026-10-30)); Julian Strawther (Out β Knee Sprain (return 2026-11-29)).
Phoenix Suns: Oso Ighodaro (Day-To-Day β Oblique Strain (return 2026-10-30)); Mark Williams (Out β Shoulder Surgery (return 2027-02-03)).
Line movement
Spread +2.5 β +4.5
Model total 228.3 vs listed 231.5 (edge -3.2) β the model doesn't price totals into any pick; tracked for the forward test only.
Forward-test hypothesis only. These are the model's strongest reads for this slate β not bets, not edges. Locked picks are the official basis; pre-lock rows are early looks β not official. Every locked pick is graded from game one (Record tab); the board is judged as a forward test after ~100 graded plays with CLV tracked.
Top spread reads ranked by gap vs book line
#
Game
Model side
Model margin
Gap vs book
Book spread
Basis
#1
Charlotte Hornets @ Washington Wizards Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:00 PM EDT
Charlotte Hornets
-10.2
-11.7
-1.5
β³ Locks at 6:30 PM ET
#2
Detroit Pistons @ Brooklyn Nets Fri Oct 30 Β· 7:30 PM EDT
Cleveland Cavaliers @ Atlanta Hawks Thu Oct 29 Β· 8:00 PM EDT
under
233.9
-3.6
237.5
β³ Locks at 7:30 PM ET
Forward-test hypothesis only. The value board is not a system, not bets, not edges.
Judged after ~100 graded plays with CLV tracked. Bar: 5+ pt model-vs-line gap. Every locked pick is graded from game one β see the Record tab.
How to read: "Model says" is who the model thinks wins and by how much. "Gap vs book" is model minus book line. "Lean" is the side the gap points to, with its line. A π flag means the gap cleared the 5-point bar.
Date
Game
Model side
Gap vs book
Book line
Basis
Fri Oct 30
CHA @ WSH
Charlotte Hornets
-11.7
-1.5
early look β not official
Fri Oct 30
DET @ BKN
Detroit Pistons
-8.2
7.5
early look β not official
All games, model vs line
Game
Model says
Book line
Gap vs book
Lean
Model total pts
Book total
Total gap
CLE @ ATL
+1.1 ATL
-1.5
-0.4
CLE +1.5
233.9
237.5
-3.6
SAC @ NO
+8.6 NO
-6.5
+2.1
NO -6.5
232.6
234.5
-1.9
MEM @ POR
+7.4 POR
-7.5
-0.1
MEM +7.5
232.2
232.5
-0.3
CHA @ WSH
-10.2 CHA
-1.5
-11.7
CHA +1.5 π
229.1
222.5
+6.6
CHI @ BOS
+17.1 BOS
-15.5
+1.6
BOS -15.5
230.2
233.5
-3.3
DET @ BKN
-15.7 DET
7.5
-8.2
DET -7.5 π
223.1
221.5
+1.6
NY @ PHI
-2.6 NY
1.5
-1.1
NY -1.5
225.9
228.5
-2.6
ORL @ TOR
+8.2 TOR
-5.5
+2.7
TOR -5.5
226.7
224.5
+2.2
IND @ MIA
+8.7 MIA
-7.5
+1.2
MIA -7.5
234.8
238.5
-3.7
HOU @ DAL
-8.9 HOU
5.5
-3.4
HOU -5.5
227.6
227.5
+0.1
LAC @ MIN
+6.2 MIN
-7.5
-1.2
LAC +7.5
226.8
221.5
+5.3
LAL @ GS
-2.1 LAL
1.5
-0.7
LAL -1.5
230.5
234.5
-4.0
DEN @ PHX
-2.2 DEN
4.5
+2.3
PHX +4.5
228.3
231.5
-3.2
How to read: this tab shows where the betting money is going β tickets (how many bets) vs money (how many dollars) on each side. It does not predict winners and never feeds the model. A side with far more money than tickets is where the big bets are.
π Money flow day by day consensus league avg ticket% vs handle% on the favorite Β· gap = sharp divergence
10 days of splits so far β early-season averages are thin; a 2-game day swings wildly.
Lopsided = a side drew 75%+ of the money. Sharp-div = handle% β tickets% β₯ 15 on a team. Favorite = negative-moneyline side (pickβem games excluded from favorite averages). 2-src = games covered by both sources that day.
π Bet differential day by day tickets vs money vs over% β and the money-minus-tickets gap
Bet differential (handle% β tickets%) positive = money heavier than tickets
π Day detail every game that day β consensus of the reporting sources
Day
Sources: 2 src = both books reported; Ξ = max ticket% disagreement between the sources on the moneyline sides. 1 src = only one book reported β consensus equals that book, treated as single-book, not consensus.
Move = biggest intraday handle swing on a moneyline side (earliest β latest snapshot of the day, consensus); β‘ = 10+ point swing. π§ = frozen line: handle swung 10+ pts while the cleatz moneyline price moved β€2 pts of implied probability over the same window. n snaps = snapshots feeding the move. Numbers refresh every ~30 min through the day.
π Team splits that team's consensus tickets vs money, day by day
Team
Splits: consensus: cleatz.com + wiseguyteam.com (DraftKings). Display only β not a model input.
How to read: each row is one locked pick, graded after the game. Spread = did the pick cover the book line? Winner = did the picked team win? Totals = over or under the book total? WβLβP = wins, losses, pushes (ties).
Against the spread locked spread pick vs locked book line
36β26β0
58.1% (pushes excluded)
Winner (moneyline) locked winner pick vs actual winner
41β21
66.1%
Totals locked total pick vs locked book total
28β34β0
45.2% (pushes excluded)
Best Bets β Spread top-5 spread picks per slate
22β14β0
61.1% (pushes excluded)
Best Bets β Winner top-5 winner picks per slate
24β12
66.7%
Best Bets β Totals top-5 totals picks per slate
18β18β0
50.0% (pushes excluded)
Record is real and graded from game one. One honest caveat: early-season games were graded on priors-heavy ratings (paper-trade phase until ~15β20 games/team, early Dec) β the inputs were thin, the grades are not. 62 graded Β· 2 voided (excluded) Β· 0 locked, awaiting final. Basis is fixed: locked pick vs locked line, append-only, never moved mid-flight. Best Bets records track the same locked rows β top-5 reads per market per slate β on the identical basis.
Game log
Date
Game
Spread pick
Spread
Total pick
Total
Winner pick
Winner
BB
Oct 21
ATL @ ORL 132β125
ATL +2.5
W
Under 233.5
L
ORL
L
β
Oct 21
MIN @ MIA 131β106
MIA -1.5
L
Under 240.5
W
MIA
L
β T
Oct 21
CHA @ BKN 110β103
CHA -1.5
W
Over 219.5
L
CHA
W
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 21
CHI @ TOR 92β135
TOR -10.5
W
Under 237.5
W
TOR
W
β Mβ T
Oct 21
UTAH @ MEM 103β123
MEM -1.5
W
Under 240.5
W
MEM
W
β S
Oct 21
IND @ NO 123β120
NO +2.5
L
Under 238.5
L
NO
L
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 21
DAL @ HOU 110β128
HOU -10.5
W
Under 230.5
L
HOU
W
β Sβ M
Oct 21
GS @ LAL 105β127
GS +6.5
L
Under 233.5
W
LAL
W
β
Oct 21
PHX @ POR 83β124
PHX +2.5
L
Under 231.5
W
POR
W
β T
Oct 21
SAC @ LAC 96β121
LAC -5.5
W
Over 226.5
L
LAC
W
β Sβ M
Oct 22
CLE @ PHI 106β114
CLE +2.5
L
Under 236.5
W
CLE
L
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 22
DEN @ OKC 84β96
OKC -7.5
W
Under 236.5
W
OKC
W
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 23
ATL @ CHA 128β81
CHA +2.5
L
Over 226.5
L
CHA
L
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 23
DAL @ IND 121β105
DAL +7.5
W
Under 239.5
W
IND
L
β Sβ T
Oct 23
MIN @ ORL 115β93
MIN +1.5
W
Under 234.5
W
MIN
W
β T
Oct 23
TOR @ WSH 112β102
TOR -9.5
W
Under 236.5
W
TOR
W
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 23
DET @ MIA 128β111
DET -1.5
W
Under 234.5
L
DET
W
β
Oct 23
HOU @ SA 114β110
SA -4.5
L
Over 224.5
L
SA
L
β M
Oct 23
NO @ UTAH 119β120
NO +1.5
W
Under 238.5
L
NO
L
β S
Oct 23
MEM @ GS 111β108
GS -4.5
L
Under 236.5
W
GS
L
β Mβ T
Oct 23
LAC @ LAL 117β125
LAC +8.5
W
Over 225.5
W
LAL
W
β S
Oct 23
POR @ SAC 128β120
SAC +9.5
W
Under 231.5
L
POR
W
β M
Oct 24
MIA @ CHA 110β115
CHA +4.5
W
Over 228.5
L
CHA
W
β Sβ T
Oct 24
BKN @ CLE 121β125
CLE -11.5
L
Under 228.5
L
CLE
W
β M
Oct 24
MIL @ PHI 116β127
MIL +13.5
W
Under 234.5
L
PHI
W
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 24
WSH @ CHI 124β120
CHI -1.5
L
Under 244.5
W
CHI
L
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 24
SA @ DAL 122β106
DAL +14.5
L
Over 229.5
L
SA
W
β Sβ M
Oct 24
HOU @ ATL 121β114
ATL +1.5
L
Over 227.5
W
ATL
L
β
Oct 24
NO @ DEN 135β141
NO +11.5
W
Under 239.5
L
DEN
W
β Mβ T
Oct 24
GS @ PHX 122β131
GS +9.5
W
Over 221.5
W
PHX
W
β Sβ T
Oct 25
LAL @ UTAH 132β123
LAL -6.5
W
Under 237.5
L
LAL
W
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 25
IND @ BKN 136β109
BKN +6.5
L
Under 231.5
L
IND
W
β Sβ T
Oct 25
ORL @ NY 111β102
NY -6.5
L
Over 224.5
L
NY
L
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 25
TOR @ MIN 94β117
TOR +3.5
L
Under 228.5
W
MIN
W
β T
Oct 25
LAC @ OKC 101β108
LAC +16.5
W
Under 224.5
W
OKC
W
β Sβ M
Oct 25
DET @ PHI 106β93
DET -1.5
W
Under 228.5
W
DET
W
β Sβ M
Oct 25
MEM @ SAC 123β112
MEM -3.5
W
Under 234.5
L
MEM
W
β Mβ T
Oct 26
WSH @ CHA 103β110
CHA -2.5
W
Over 227.5
L
CHA
W
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 26
MIN @ CLE 125β127
MIN +3.5
W
Under 234.5
L
MIN
L
β S
Oct 26
CHI @ BOS 99β134
BOS -13.5
W
Under 233.5
W
BOS
W
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 26
DAL @ MIA 113β109
MIA -7.5
L
Under 240.5
W
MIA
L
β Mβ T
Oct 26
IND @ MIL 102β110
MIL +3.5
W
Under 238.5
W
MIL
W
β Sβ T
Oct 26
PHX @ OKC 114β125
OKC -8.5
W
Over 221.5
W
OKC
W
β Sβ M
Oct 26
ATL @ HOU 110β120
ATL +4.5
L
Under 229.5
L
HOU
W
β
Oct 26
MEM @ UTAH 110β105
MEM -1.5
W
Over 237.5
L
MEM
W
β
Oct 26
GS @ DEN 134β114
DEN -7.5
L
Under 236.5
L
DEN
L
β Mβ T
Oct 27
BKN @ BOS 124β125
BOS -12.5
L
Under 222.5
L
BOS
W
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 27
DET @ NY 97β111
DET +3.5
L
Over 219.5
L
DET
L
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 27
SAC @ SA 103β130
SA -18.5
W
Under 232.5
L
SA
W
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 27
POR @ LAL 136β129
LAL -1.5
L
Under 233.5
L
LAL
L
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 28
MIA @ ATL 129β117
ATL -2.5
L
Under 241.5
L
ATL
L
β Sβ T
Oct 28
WSH @ CLE 111β121
CLE -9.5
W
Under 240.5
W
CLE
W
β Sβ Mβ T
Oct 28
CHA @ DET 89β97
CHA +7.5
L
Over 212.5
L
DET
W
β T
Oct 28
PHI @ IND 114β109
IND +7.5
W
Under 234.5
W
PHI
W
β T
Oct 28
ORL @ TOR 99β129
TOR -4.5
W
Over 224.5
W
TOR
W
β
Oct 28
NY @ CHI 133β127
NY -6.5
L
Under 232.5
L
NY
W
β Sβ M
Oct 28
HOU @ MIL 132β100
HOU -8.5
W
Under 226.5
L
HOU
W
β M
Oct 28
GS @ MIN 119β114
MIN -4.5
L
Over 227.5
W
MIN
L
β S
Oct 28
DEN @ NO 104β91
DEN -4.5
W
Under 240.5
W
DEN
W
β T
Oct 28
SA @ UTAH 117β111
UTAH +14.5
W
Over 232.5
L
SA
W
β M
Oct 28
OKC @ DAL 96β120
OKC -5.5
L
Under 228.5
W
OKC
L
β Sβ M
Oct 28
LAL @ LAC 103β87
LAL +1.5
W
Over 225.5
L
LAC
L
β
Oct 21
MIL @ WSH voided β excluded from record
Locked while CHO/BRK/PHO/WAS silently ran 0.0 net ratings (BREF2ESPN mapping bug) β corrupted basis. Graded 2-1 (WSH 128-116: spread WSH -4.
Oct 23
NY @ BOS voided β excluded from record
Locked while NYK silently ran 0.0 net rating (BREF2ESPN mapping bug β missing NYKβNY entry) β corrupted basis. Graded 2-1 (BOS 107-103: spre
Running record by week
Week
Spread
Spread run
Winner
Winner run
Totals
Totals run
Wk of Oct 19
22β15β0
22β15β0
25β12
25β12
18β19β0
18β19β0
Wk of Oct 26
14β11β0
36β26β0
16β9
41β21
10β15β0
28β34β0
The core question
Not "are we smarter than the line." Instead: "what's in the line, and which part can we see through?"
line = efficiency truth + rest/B2B state + public shade + brand tax + key-number rounding + vig.
The model projects only the parts it can measure honestly (efficiency truth, schedule state) and keeps them separable from the parts it can't (shade, brand tax, vig) β so every gap vs the line can be asked which component is this?
Pick-lock rule
Picks lock 30 minutes before tipoff. At that moment the model's spread side, total side, and moneyline side are frozen together with the DraftKings spread, total, and moneyline as they stand then.
Before the lock, the app shows the current model pick and the time it locks. Value flags on those games are early looks β not official.
Once locked, the Value board judges only the locked pick against the locked line. Nothing moves after the lock β the log is append-only, no edits, no deletions. A missed lock window is a missed lock, never backfilled.
Basis is fixed: locked pick vs locked line, graded from game one (Record tab). The value board is judged as a forward-test hypothesis after ~100 graded plays with closing-line value tracked β never bets, never edges.
Efficiency core
Net rating (offensive β defensive rating, pace-adjusted) blended: curr_w = min(1, gp/20) * 0.8 ; prior_w = 1 - curr_w.
Prior = 2025-26 final ratings. HFA = 2.0 pts (walk-forward tested 2021-22β2024-25, pooled 1.99). Win chance from a bell curve, width 13.5 (untested).
Every factor beyond the efficiency core is walk-forward tested before wiring. Nothing enters the projection on theory alone.
Rest/B2B edge is currently 0.0 β displayed, logged daily to the rest log for the future backtest, not priced in.
Honest limits
Season tipped off 2026-10-20: ratings are heavily weighted to 2025-26 priors; paper-trade phase until ~15-20 games per team (early December).
Value board is a forward-test hypothesis (5+ pt bar, ~100 graded plays, CLV tracked). Never presented as bets or edges.
NBA.com stats API times out from this VM; ratings source is basketball-reference advanced team stats.
Team net ratings
Offense/defense = points per 100 possessions. Net rating = offense minus defense. Last-season weight = how much of the rating still comes from last season.
Abbr
Team
Net rating
Offense
Defense
Pace
Games
Last-season weight
OKC
Oklahoma City Thunder
+9.70
117.1
107.4
99.1
5
80%
BOS
Boston Celtics
+8.07
120.3
112.3
95.5
4
84%
SA
San Antonio Spurs
+7.92
118.6
110.7
99.9
5
80%
DET
Detroit Pistons
+7.86
116.9
109.0
98.9
5
80%
HOU
Houston Rockets
+7.16
119.6
112.4
96.8
5
80%
NY
New York Knicks
+5.24
117.9
112.7
97.4
5
80%
MIN
Minnesota Timberwolves
+5.06
116.5
111.5
100.8
5
80%
TOR
Toronto Raptors
+4.74
115.4
110.6
99.4
4
84%
DEN
Denver Nuggets
+3.86
120.7
116.8
98.3
4
84%
CLE
Cleveland Cavaliers
+3.75
118.4
114.7
100.3
4
84%
LAL
Los Angeles Lakers
+3.36
119.2
115.9
98.6
5
80%
ATL
Atlanta Hawks
+2.90
116.1
113.2
102.1
5
80%
CHA
Charlotte Hornets
+2.50
116.4
113.9
96.8
5
80%
POR
Portland Trail Blazers
+1.97
116.1
114.2
100.5
3
88%
LAC
Los Angeles Clippers
+0.77
115.5
114.7
97.1
4
84%
PHI
Philadelphia 76ers
+0.58
113.7
113.1
100.3
5
80%
MIA
Miami Heat
+0.26
115.1
114.8
103.5
5
80%
PHX
Phoenix Suns
-0.42
114.8
115.2
97.0
3
88%
GS
Golden State Warriors
-0.84
115.5
116.4
98.8
5
80%
ORL
Orlando Magic
-1.43
113.1
114.5
100.5
4
84%
MEM
Memphis Grizzlies
-3.38
113.6
117.0
101.0
4
84%
DAL
Dallas Mavericks
-3.84
111.7
115.5
101.4
5
80%
NO
New Orleans Pelicans
-4.66
113.9
118.6
100.5
4
84%
IND
Indiana Pacers
-6.28
111.2
117.5
101.3
5
80%
CHI
Chicago Bulls
-7.10
111.7
118.8
103.4
5
80%
MIL
Milwaukee Bucks
-7.22
112.3
119.5
98.7
5
80%
UTAH
Utah Jazz
-8.08
113.4
121.5
101.7
5
80%
WSH
Washington Wizards
-9.80
111.5
121.3
101.1
5
80%
BKN
Brooklyn Nets
-10.14
108.7
118.9
97.9
4
84%
SAC
Sacramento Kings
-11.30
110.7
122.0
99.4
4
84%
Quarter wins + scoring only. No quarter spread or total lines exist in free sources, so there are no against-the-spread or over/under columns here β a quarter win is a quarter moneyline win. Overtime periods excluded. Display only β not a model input.
68 finished games since Oct 20. 34 tied quarters (counted as neither win nor loss). Click a header to sort.
Quarter records W-L per quarter, season to date
Team
GP
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
All Q
Q win%
Toronto Raptors
4
3-1
3-1
2-2
4-0
12-4
0.8%
Portland Trail Blazers
3
1-2
3-0
3-0
1-1-1
8-3
0.7%
Houston Rockets
5
4-1
3-1-1
3-1-1
2-2-1
12-5
0.7%
Minnesota Timberwolves
5
4-1
3-2
4-1
2-2-1
13-6
0.7%
San Antonio Spurs
5
2-3
4-1
3-2
2-0-3
11-6
0.6%
Los Angeles Lakers
5
3-2
4-1
3-1-1
1-4
11-8
0.6%
Boston Celtics
4
2-2
2-0-2
3-1
1-3
8-6
0.6%
Memphis Grizzlies
4
1-3
3-1
2-2
3-1
9-7
0.6%
New York Knicks
5
4-1
2-3
1-2-2
3-2
10-8
0.6%
Washington Wizards
5
4-1
2-3
3-2
2-3
11-9
0.6%
Dallas Mavericks
5
2-3
3-2
3-2
3-2
11-9
0.6%
Cleveland Cavaliers
4
2-2
2-2
3-1
1-2-1
8-7
0.5%
Atlanta Hawks
5
2-3
2-2-1
2-2-1
3-1-1
9-8
0.5%
Detroit Pistons
5
3-2
0-4-1
3-2
4-1
10-9
0.5%
Indiana Pacers
5
1-3-1
2-3
4-1
3-2
10-9
0.5%
Philadelphia 76ers
5
1-3-1
1-3-1
4-1
3-2
9-9
0.5%
Golden State Warriors
5
3-2
2-3
2-3
3-2
10-10
0.5%
Oklahoma City Thunder
5
3-2
2-3
2-2-1
2-3
9-10
0.5%
Charlotte Hornets
5
2-2-1
4-1
2-3
1-4
9-10
0.5%
Utah Jazz
5
4-1
2-3
0-4-1
2-2-1
8-10
0.4%
New Orleans Pelicans
4
1-3
3-1
3-1
0-4
7-9
0.4%
Los Angeles Clippers
4
2-2
1-3
1-3
3-1
7-9
0.4%
Miami Heat
5
2-2-1
2-3
1-4
2-2-1
7-11
0.4%
Denver Nuggets
4
3-1
1-3
0-4
2-2
6-10
0.4%
Milwaukee Bucks
5
2-3
2-3
2-3
1-4
7-13
0.3%
Orlando Magic
4
1-3
1-3
1-2-1
2-2
5-10
0.3%
Brooklyn Nets
4
2-2
0-3-1
1-3
2-2
5-10
0.3%
Sacramento Kings
4
2-2
1-3
1-3
1-2-1
5-10
0.3%
Phoenix Suns
3
0-3
1-2
1-1-1
1-1-1
3-7
0.3%
Chicago Bulls
5
0-5
3-1-1
0-4-1
2-3
5-13
0.3%
Quarter scoring points for / against per quarter, per game
Team
GP
Q1 PF
Q1 PA
Q2 PF
Q2 PA
Q3 PF
Q3 PA
Q4 PF
Q4 PA
Tot PF
Tot PA
Atlanta Hawks
5
29.4
29.8
32.6
29.4
27.4
29.2
30.8
26.8
120.2
115.2
Boston Celtics
4
28.2
26.5
29.2
25.8
33.0
25.8
27.2
32.0
117.8
110.0
Brooklyn Nets
4
27.5
28.0
27.2
32.8
26.0
31.8
31.8
29.5
112.5
122.0
Charlotte Hornets
5
23.8
25.8
29.8
26.6
25.2
27.0
22.2
28.8
101.0
108.2
Chicago Bulls
5
24.2
34.0
32.4
28.0
28.6
37.8
28.8
30.4
114.0
130.2
Cleveland Cavaliers
4
32.0
30.2
29.5
26.8
29.5
28.0
25.2
29.8
116.2
114.8
Dallas Mavericks
5
31.4
29.6
27.2
28.8
29.4
28.2
26.0
25.4
114.0
112.0
Denver Nuggets
4
30.0
27.0
24.5
28.5
24.5
32.2
28.0
24.0
107.0
111.8
Detroit Pistons
5
32.2
24.6
19.8
26.8
28.6
27.6
29.2
24.4
109.8
103.4
Golden State Warriors
5
30.0
28.8
27.2
28.6
31.4
33.2
29.0
28.8
117.6
119.4
Houston Rockets
5
29.8
27.0
32.2
22.2
30.6
29.2
30.4
30.4
123.0
108.8
Indiana Pacers
5
28.6
31.4
26.8
30.8
32.0
23.6
27.6
29.0
115.0
114.8
Los Angeles Clippers
4
28.5
26.0
23.8
28.2
29.0
29.5
25.2
24.2
106.5
108.0
Los Angeles Lakers
5
30.6
33.0
36.0
25.6
32.6
26.6
24.0
28.4
123.2
113.6
Memphis Grizzlies
4
29.2
28.5
33.0
26.0
29.5
29.2
25.0
23.2
116.8
107.0
Miami Heat
5
30.0
30.8
28.2
31.0
25.2
31.4
29.6
27.6
113.0
120.8
Milwaukee Bucks
5
26.4
25.6
26.2
33.2
34.8
35.0
26.0
30.4
113.4
124.2
Minnesota Timberwolves
5
29.2
25.4
28.6
27.6
30.6
23.4
29.6
28.6
118.0
105.0
New Orleans Pelicans
4
28.8
32.5
30.2
25.5
31.8
27.0
23.2
33.2
114.0
118.2
New York Knicks
5
27.8
28.2
25.4
24.6
27.2
26.4
29.4
30.4
109.8
109.6
Oklahoma City Thunder
5
28.8
27.0
26.8
24.2
28.4
28.6
24.2
24.8
108.2
104.6
Orlando Magic
4
24.8
28.5
27.2
34.0
24.8
28.2
30.2
28.8
107.0
119.5
Philadelphia 76ers
5
24.4
28.8
29.4
30.2
27.4
25.0
29.6
23.4
110.8
107.4
Phoenix Suns
3
20.3
33.7
29.3
30.7
34.7
35.0
25.0
24.3
109.3
123.7
Portland Trail Blazers
3
34.0
27.7
32.3
31.0
37.7
27.7
25.3
24.3
129.3
110.7
Sacramento Kings
4
29.8
33.0
28.0
33.8
24.8
33.0
25.2
25.8
107.8
125.5
San Antonio Spurs
5
29.6
31.6
30.8
27.4
28.6
27.4
25.2
22.4
114.2
108.8
Toronto Raptors
4
32.5
25.2
28.8
25.8
26.0
27.5
30.2
24.0
117.5
102.5
Utah Jazz
5
32.4
27.6
25.8
32.2
27.0
33.2
26.0
24.8
111.2
117.8
Washington Wizards
5
27.4
27.4
27.2
30.8
30.2
27.4
28.8
30.2
113.6
115.8
π Roster moves trades, signings, waivers
Newest first. π marks moves flagged as notable.
2026-10-28 Β· LAL β Waived F AK Okereke. Signed C Lawson Lovering to a two-way contract.
2026-10-27 Β· MIN β Signed F Enrique Freeman to a two-way contract.
2026-10-23 Β· SAC β Signed G Sean Pedulla to a two-way contract.
2026-10-23 Β· NY β Waived G Kevin McCullar Jr..
2026-10-19 Β· SAC β Waived G Adam Flagler.
π 2026-10-19 Β· PHX β Signed F Oso Ighodaro to a multiyear contract extension. Claimed F Drew Timme off waivers. Converted C Duop Reath's contract to a two-way contract. Waived F CJ Huntley and G Koby Brea.
2026-10-19 Β· OKC β Re-signed G Cason Wallace to a rookie-scale contract extension.
2026-10-19 Β· MIL β Waived G Kevin Porter Jr.
2026-10-19 Β· MEM β Waived G Walter Clayton Jr. and G Micah Peavy.
2026-10-19 Β· LAL β Waived F Dalton Knecht.
2026-10-19 Β· HOU β Waived Sean Pedulla. Converted Fs Oscar Tshiebwe and Julian Phillips's contract to two-way contracts.
2026-10-19 Β· DAL β Waived F Dwight Powell.
2026-10-19 Β· CHA β Signed G Brandon Miller to a multiyear contract extension.
2026-10-17 Β· WSH β Waived Gs Nolan Hickman, Trevor Keels, Alondes Williams and F Chris Livington.
π 2026-10-17 Β· UTAH β Claimed C Tony Bradley off waivers. Converted the contract of F Harrison Ingram to a twpo-way contract. Waived C Jonas Aidoo and G Tamar Bates.
2026-10-17 Β· TOR β Converted the contract of C Nate Bittle to a two-way contract. Waived Gs Nimari Burnett, Jalen Celestine, Tyreke Key, F Tyson Degenhart and C Jamarion Sharp.
2026-10-17 Β· SAC β Waived Gs Elfrid Payton and Tristen Newton. Waived F Viktor Lakhin.
2026-10-17 Β· POR β Waived F Jeremy Sochan.
2026-10-17 Β· PHX β Waived G Kennedy Chandler and Fs Haywood Highsmith and Phillip Wheeler.
2026-10-17 Β· PHI β Waived Fs Cris Carroll, Taye Fields and Dillon Jones. Waived G Jameer Nelson Jr.
2026-10-17 Β· ORL β Waived Fs Malaki Branham and Kevin Knox II. Waived G JD Davison.
2026-10-17 Β· OKC β Waived F Buddy Boeheim, C Christoph Tilly and Gs. Nate Johnson, Dariq Whitehead and Lamar Wilderson.
2026-10-17 Β· NY β Waived Gs Bruce Brown and Dink Pate.
2026-10-17 Β· NO β Waived F Jalon Moore.
2026-10-17 Β· MIN β Waived Fs Enrique Freeman, KJ Martin, Norchad Omier, Drew Timme and G Antonio Reeves.
2026-10-17 Β· MIL β Waived Fs Johni Broome, Pete Nance, G Marcus Garrett and C Jake Stephens.
2026-10-17 Β· MIA β Waived Fs Ezra Ausar and Gabe Madsen. Waived G Bez Mbeng and C Kylor Kelley.
2026-10-17 Β· MEM β Waived F Zach Cleveland.
2026-10-17 Β· LAL β Waived C Rafael Castro and F Niwa Tait-Jones.
2026-10-17 Β· LAC β Signed G Cam Christie to a two-way contract. Waived Gs Miye Oni, Jahmyl Telfort and Blake Wesley.
2026-10-17 Β· IND β Waived Cs Keba Keita, Rienk Mast and F James Johnson.
2026-10-17 Β· HOU β Waived Gs Bryce Harris, Caleb McConnell and F Cameron Matthews.